Laserfiche WebLink
<br />think about their assets at risk with respect to the particular hazards. Many that could not <br />attend emailed their participation back to DEM. <br /> <br />The SHMT met one more time to review existing natural hazard data, identify agency <br />roles and responsibilities, identify new sources of information, conduct risk <br />assessments, prioritize goals, and identify potential actions. These meetings, along <br />with the agenda items, are presented below. <br /> <br />Meeting 2: July 12, 2007 <br /> <br />. Review and update the reported assets of each agency <br /> <br />. Review and update the risk assessment <br /> <br />. Identify strategies for protecting assets (existing and potential) <br /> <br />Participation Request 3: Early September, 2007 <br /> <br />. Identify general and specific projects each agency is already doing with <br />respect to protecting life and assets <br /> <br />. Identify general and specific projects each agency would like to do if funds <br />were available <br /> <br />. Identify proj ects other agencies are doing (including local, state and federal <br />government agencies) <br /> <br />. Update progress on mitigation projects already listed in the NHMP <br /> <br />During the plan preparation process, informal meetings were scheduled to identify <br />federal requirements, discuss additional data needs and sources for the data, and to <br />collect pertinent information. Typically, these meetings were conducted with <br />representatives of the agencies that were included in the SHMT. With respect to the <br />Flood Plan, a meeting was scheduled with the Governor's Flood Task Force on <br />September 18, 2007 to present the results of the draft Flood Plan and obtain approval <br />of the document. <br /> <br />The risk questionnaire was sent to all local emergency managers of the counties and cities <br />with populations over 100,000 to fill out for their region. The mitigation specialist <br />followed through, collecting them through email. The information was used to update the <br />chapter/section on local information and to determine concerns by county/city/region for <br />local emergency managers. Information from the local hazard mitigation plans was also <br />used for the updates, risk assessments, strategies, and potential proj ects. Several local hazard <br /> <br />5 <br />