My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
13c
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
13c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:35:13 PM
Creation date
8/8/2007 3:47:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/11/2007
Description
CWCB Director's Report
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />potential evaluation of the Lees Ferry stream gage, and further discussions associated <br />with the Commissions role if Upper Basin curtailments become necessary. <br /> <br />The meeting concluded with a tour of some of the Central Utah Project facilities. <br /> <br />Zebra\Quagga Mussel Invasion into Colorado River Reservoirs: These <br />mussels are harmful fouling mussels that attach themselves to submerged objects. They <br />fill and block pipes and clog protective screens. Zebra mussels are efficient filter <br />feeders that strip food from the water needed to support other aquatic life. Direct <br />economic costs are on the order of $100 million a year in eastern North America and <br />there are un-quantified secondary and environmental costs as well. Impacts in the west <br />could be greater than those in eastern North America. The first detection of these <br />mussels was observed in Lake Mead were the consequences to downstream water <br />deliveries, Southern Nevada's water intakes and power generation could be enormous. <br /> <br />We understand that there is consideration of a surprising proposal by the biologists to <br />greatly draw down Lake Mead to try to eradicate the Quagga Mussel. The proposal <br />includes a recommendation that Mead be drawn down between 73 to 123 feet, which <br />could take Mead all the way to the SNW A intake. The feasibility of such a proposal is <br />highly questionable, particularly given the current drought and since it would take just <br />a few mussels to get the whole thing started again. Obviously such an action would <br />greatly affect Lake Powell. This situation bears close watching. <br /> <br />Colorado River Shortages: On June 18, the Bureau of Reclamation announced it <br />selected a preferred alternative after reviewing comments related to its Colorado River <br />Interim Guidelines for Lower Basin Shortages and Coordinated Operations of Lake <br />Powell and Lake Mead. The key elements of a plan submitted by the seven basin states <br />are incorporated. In addition, it creates flexibility for the potential storage of additional <br />conserved water in Lake Mead in the future. <br /> <br />There are detailed provisions to improve coordinated operations of Lake Powell and <br />Lake Mead through a full range of reservoir levels. Colorado and non-Colorado River <br />waters saved through conservation measures in the Lower Basin, "intentionally created <br />surplus" water, will be credited and made available for release at a later time from Lake <br />Mead. Up to 2.1 million acre-feet (Maf) could be so stored, with a possible future <br />increase of up to 4.2 Mat. Current interim surplus guidelines would be modified, and <br />extended through 2026, to address Lake Mead operations at a relatively full pool and <br />determine when "surplus" supplies would be available to Lower Basin water users. A <br />final environmental impact statement is expected to be released in September. For a <br /> <br />32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.