Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <br /> <br />Comments <br /> <br />n Q: Why has buying out WMIDD not been considered. <br /> <br />n <br /> <br />Q: Solutions should focus on voluntary, willing, sellers. High likelihood <br />that WMIDD is not interested in participating in a fallowing program, and <br />that the price per acre would be very high for them to be willing to consider. <br /> <br />C~j <br />~ <br /> <br />n <br /> <br />Q: Land fallowing produces third party social impacts. These need to be <br />addressed if fallowing is considered. <br /> <br />[\,) <br />'" <br />w <br />00 <br /> <br />n <br /> <br />Q: Report to Congress will likely not be a final decision document, but <br />rather identify the concepts that further studies will be focusing on. <br /> <br />n <br /> <br />Q: Could move forward with smaller scale Yuma Conduit (25 kat) without <br />having to decide on the full plan. After meeting Question was asked: Is the <br />environmental compliance adequate? <br /> <br />n <br /> <br />Q: A better understanding is needed of the Yuma Groundwater proposals. <br />A presentation of the model results may be helpful. <br />