Laserfiche WebLink
<br />------------------- <br /> <br />Comments <br /> <br />n Q: Annual Cost savings for demolishing the Desalt Plan, and not having to <br />maintain it should also be considered. This assumes that a permanent <br />solution that completely addresses the bypass is determined. <br /> <br />CJ <br />o <br />N <br />c.f:) <br />....... <br />;.,;;:) <br /> <br />n <br /> <br />Q: Discussion should recognize that Yuma Groundwater recovery plans are <br />able to utilize operating the Desalt Plant to treat local groundwater at a cost <br />significantly less than the operating costs for YDP to treat WMIDD return. <br />And that the groundwater loss to Mexico is at least 70 kaf/yr. <br /> <br />n <br /> <br />Q: The Schedule for the Report to Congress and the Schedule and nature of <br />the overall process needs to be laid out. <br /> <br />n <br /> <br />Q: Next Meeting scheduled for June 27. (following AOP) <br />