Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - <br /> <br />Comments <br /> <br />n Q: Need to reVIew t e costs 0 tea ternatIves. For use 0 CAP, t e <br />system water would not be project water, and therefore the supply would not <br />have access to project power. Alternative may be more expensive than is <br />estimated. <br /> <br />n <br /> <br />Q: Are the costs related to the Desalt Plant the differential costs of <br />operation. Assume that they do not include the stand by costs which would <br />be incurred anyway. <br /> <br />Co.:: <br />Cl <br />[\,) <br />W <br />W <br />-.J <br /> <br />n <br /> <br />Q: Costs of fallowing should be reviewed. Likely more expensive than <br />estimating. <br /> <br />n <br /> <br />Q: Buyout ofWMIDD should be considered. Fallowing ofWMIDD has <br />double effect of providing a supply, and reducing MODE flow. Optimizing <br />options within Yuma, such as combining with pumping local groundwater <br />into Mode, should be considered. <br />