Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />During their construction of the existing channel, the Corps designed a temporary bypass <br />flume and ditch that; ran along part of Creede Avenue, Cliffe Street, and La Garita Street. <br />Today the construction of such a flume and ditch will be very expensive and would raise <br />multiple issues for the community. It would require the road shoulders and road <br />crossings to be excavated and repaired to its existing condition. Access to homes and <br />driveways would be' another problem. The bypass ditch used during the Corps' design <br />and construction had a 5 feet bottom width with 1 Y2 to 1 side slopes and was 3 feet deep <br />and included an elevated steel flume section. <br />. , <br /> <br />The bypass proposal that is estimated for this alternative includes the construction of <br />upstream temporary: dams and pumping of the water to a location downstream of thle <br />section being constrUcted. The length of bypass pumping could range between a couple <br />of hundred feet and up to a thousand feet long. The pumps would need to run 24 hours a <br />day and 7 days a week until the construction of each segment is finished. The pumps <br />estimated for this alternative include sound attenuation enclosures that will reduce the <br />noise level to about 30 decibels. Once one segment of the construction is completed the <br />bypass system is moved downstream to another section and so on until the construction <br />ofthe project is completed. The temporary dam setup could be a proprietary system <br />designed and installbd by commercially known subcontractors or could be designed by <br />the contractor by th~ir registered engineer. <br />, <br />, <br /> <br />The cost ofthis alterinative is estimated at $3,120,000 and includes the temporary dams <br />and pump water bypass system as mentioned above, but excludes appurtenances. <br />, <br /> <br />I <br />6.2 ALTERNATIVE 2 - RECTANGULAR CHANNEL SHAPE <br />, <br /> <br />This rectangular channel alternative would include reinforced concrete for the lining <br />material. A general drawing ofthis alternative can be referenced in Figure A3 in <br />Appendix A. The options of either a cast in place or precast system should be considered <br />and as mentioned above are driven by the cost savings to the contractor. This alternative <br />has the following advantages and disadvantages.. <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />A rectangular channel is considered due to its smaller cross-sectional width. This allows <br />for some access duripg construction within the rights of way. The rectangular section <br />would provide working space to either side of the channel. This working space coulld be <br />utilized to install a water bypass system for Willow Creek inside this right of way. The <br />bypass system will c'onsist of a temporary dam upstream of the immediate construction <br />area with a pipe or pipes running along the trench of the channel. The pipes will convey <br />the water downstream of the construction section. This is cost effective because the pipe <br />flow is driven by gr~vity. The process will repeat until the channel is fully constructed. <br />Construction of a se<:tion of several hundred feet would be appropriate and the pipe could <br />be sized to a reasonable flow. The rectangular channel width is sized to approximatdy <br />the same dimensions as the original timber chute. This is referenced from the Corps of <br />Engineer's construction drawings showing cross sections from station 18+65 to 20+02 <br />, <br /> <br />NRCS Northern Plains Engineering Team 7 <br />