My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12597
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
WSP12597
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:16:43 PM
Creation date
8/2/2007 8:45:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
7630.650
Description
Wild and Scenic - Yampa River
State
CO
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Date
3/1/1990
Author
Unknown
Title
Yampa River Basin Study 1988-1991 - Multiple Rough Drafts of Scope of Work - With Study Schedule - 03-15-90 through 07-09-90
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />" <br /> <br />003195 <br /> <br />TASK 5.B-ENVIRONME1\'-AL CONSIDERATIONS <br /> <br />Purpose <br /> <br />This task will identify environmental constraints that are fatal flaws or would signifi- <br />cantly impact adversely the construction or operation of the 10 pOtential reservoir sites <br />identified in Task 2. BIO/WEST will have fielu scientists to accompany engineering <br />staff when they conduct their initial reconnaissance visits. This first field trip is sched- <br />uled for September 1990. <br /> <br />Responsibility <br /> <br />BIO/WEST will be responsible for this task. <br /> <br />Approach <br /> <br />The study team will undertake the following activity: <br /> <br />1. For the 10 alternative reservoir sites identified in Task 2, obvious environmental <br />fatal flaws will be identified and those sites will be eliminated from further con- <br />sideration. Elimination will be based on identification of environmental issues <br />that in the judgement of resource specialists would constitute a fatal flaw in the <br />National Environmental Policy Act (NEP A) process if the site were eventually <br />selected. Environmentally sensitive issues may involve the presence of imponant <br />game fisheries or wildlife, endangered species (i.e., bald eagles, peregrine fal- <br />cons, black-footed ferrets, Colorado squawfish, humpback chub, bonytaiI), exten- <br />sive and important wetlands, or heavily used recreational facilities. <br /> <br />2. Coordinate input of the environmental considerations to the screening process <br />(Task S.D). <br /> <br />Products <br /> <br />1. Provide a list of alternative reservoir sites that should be eliminated from further <br />consideration with a discussion on the reasons for elimination with environ- <br />mental fatal flaws identified. <br /> <br />TASK S.C--COST CONSIDERATIONS <br /> <br />Purpose <br /> <br />This task will develop preliminary cost estimates for each of the 10 alternative reservoir <br />sites that have passed the screening for yield and geotechnical/environmental fatal flaws <br />(Tasks S.A and S.B). The cost estimates will be based on major project elements <br /> <br />20 <br /> <br />DENI800P/033.51 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.