Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,-,r;o.J '-'-'I"1~UL.. I MI"'I I .LJ'=I~V'=r;;.: <br /> <br />1::111 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />001820 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />The criteria were grouped Into six major categories: water source, water quality Including <br /> <br />temperature, site physical factors, biological considerations, locational factors and <br />probable cost ,and a point value 8EsigneEJ to each category as shown In Table S. <br /> <br />Key guidelines used in setting the value for each of the criteria were that the maximum <br /> <br /> <br />N <br /> <br />possible point total for any site was set at 100, and the criteria categories (e.g. water <br />~~ <br />source, bialogisal conslder.lons) were weight~d such that there was a limit to the <br /> <br />maximum number of points which can be achieved for any criteria c~tegory and <br />subcategory. The intent of limiting the value for anyone crfterla and the total score was <br /> <br />so that no site would receive an Inordinate number of rating. points for a given criteria <br /> <br />category. A site could receive a fatal flaw rating If a site condition was determined to be <br /> <br />not acceptable. The six rating categories and the ~Ij d'til tr"I'.:-?'olnt values f~ <br />~~~~ c:::a.<e . ~ ~ <br /> <br />., shown In Tab'83e ~ y <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />The rating concept and selection of the three highest ranking sites for gesign <br />~~ <br />development was later modified because the three sites with the highest r:atings were all <br /> <br /><il~Jk.12.~ <br /> <br />similar sites located in the same geographic ~eglon. t~e San Lu~ Valley of the Rio Grande _ ._ ",..i ~./ <br />~~ ...(I) ~~ c~ ~ ~ "'-~ ~-\U.i. ~r- ~~~ ~ <br /> <br />Basin" The high fIMiReIs resulted from availability of naturally occurring high temperature <br />Y"Q.N\"~ <br /> <br />(700 to 11SeF) groundwater that Is preferred for spawning and growth and offers a <br /> <br /> <br />significant cost advantage over heating a cold water supply. To provide for greater <br /> <br /> <br />fie ibility in the ultimate selection of a hatchery site, feasibility level designs were l'fI\~ <br />/) <br /> <br />11 <br />