Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1219/11/92 <br /> <br />148 <br /> <br />URS CONSULTANT DENUER <br />'e <br /> <br />1211218 <br /> <br />001819 <br /> <br />\ ~",'" : <br />TABLE 1/ i <br />sruOY SITE LIST FOLLOWING THE INITIAL SCREENING <br /> <br />Site Name and Location <br /> <br />Site 10 <br />Number <br /> <br />1. Glenwood Desalinization Facility (near Glenwood Sprl~gs, CO) <br />2. CO-Ute PlantfCIRG Site (near Craig, CO) i <br />6. Rine Falls SFH (near Rifle, CO) <br />8. Clines Fish Hatchery (Monte Vista, CO) <br />9. Putnam Rsh Hatchery (Durango, CO) <br />10. Silver Springs Trout Farm (Montrose. CO) <br />11. McMillan's Trout Farm (Hotchkiss, CO) <br />15. Crystal Properties (near Hooper, CO) <br />, 6. Horsethief Site (near Grand Junction, CO) , <br />, 8. Walter Walker State Wildlife Area (Grand Junction, CO) <br />23. Rangevlew Trout Ranch (Saguache, CO) . <br />24. John Stroh (near Hotchkiss, CO) <br />25. Russell Lakes SWA (Saguache, CO) <br />26. Closed Basin Project (near San Luis lake, CO) <br />28. New Wastewater Treatment Plant (near Craig, CO) <br />32. Grand Junction Site #1 (Summerville Ranch, CO) <br /> <br />(0~> <br /> <br />SITE EVALUATION AND FINAL SCREEt-IlNG <br /> <br />The purpose of this site evaluation task was to screen the 16 $ites listed In Table 1 to the <br />three highest ranking sites for which feasibility level 88R68~~111 hatche~deSlgnS would <br />be developed in a later task. As with the initial site screening t~Sk, the sl evaluation and <br />screening criteria used for evaluating these remaining 16 slte~ was bas d on input from <br />the TAC and the Consultants Study Team. The following sqreenlng methodology was. ) <br />used: 1 <br /> <br />· Each of the potential sites was visited to confirm and s,upplement site Information <br />gathered from the information request forms and other sources. <br /> <br />· . More detailed site criteria were developed In the are:as of water supply, water <br />temperature and quality, site physical factors, blolqglcal considerations, site <br />location factors and estimated construction and oper~tlon costs. <br /> <br />· A system was developed for evaluating and rating .ach of the potential sites <br />against technical criteria and then ranking each 01 the sites based on the <br />evaluation. ! <br /> <br />/q <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />I< <br />