Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1219/11/92 <br /> <br />148 <br /> <br />URS CONSULTANT DENUER <br />i e. <br /> <br />12107 <br /> <br />001818 <br /> <br />4) compilation of known and suspected fish diseases for ~ach of the endangered and <br />related species; and, i c.d'i('~;,~ -f <br />5) integration of prior experience on fishery facility deslg:n and wtm2lA, concepts to )4. <br />provide state~of-the-art methodologies for creating a fully integrate~acility. <br /> <br />SITE IDENTIFICATION AND INITIAL SCREENING i r~ <br /> <br />The TAC and the Consultant Team complied 'a list of 33 potenlial sites located throughout <br />the state. The 33 sites inCluded existing hQlChery facilities a~d other undeveloped sites <br />that had certain potential for recovery facility development. ~lfteen additional sites were / <br />evaluated by the T AC but were determined to not be feasibl~ and were not Included In <br />~~~ i <br /> <br />An information request form was mailed to each of the contacts for the 33 sites.. <br />Information such as available water sources; flow rates; waterjquality parameters such as <br />temperature, dissolved solids and pH; water rights informati~>n; description of land and /' <br />improvements; potential hazards such as flooding and availa~lIity of community services <br />for each site were requested. Development of the Inform~tlon request form and site <br />screening methodology w~s based upon technical iss~es related to biological, <br />engineering and operational considerations. ' <br /> <br />The general site selection criteria and screening factors wer~: water source, flow rate, <br />water quality. site physical charaCteristics. biological conSider~ions, locatlonal factors. and <br />the estimated cost range of construction, operation and maintenance for a h$tchery <br />facility. i <br /> <br />Originally t the initial screening methodology was to be ba,sed on a numerical rating <br />system applied to each of the general site selection criteria fac~ors described above, using ____ <br />the data obtained from the information request form~ and other independent <br />investigations. Due to Incomplete or unavailable data. appllc~tlon of the numerical rating <br />criteria for site screening was not feaSible. Therefore, each :Of the sites was Objectively <br />reviewed and evaluated by the Consultant Team and the T AQ, and, based on the relative <br />rating of the site selection criteria, the Initial 33 sites were screened to 16. and are listed <br />in Table 1. A brief d.escription of the 16 potential sites is provided at the end of this <br />~~~ i <br /> <br />,,~ <br />