Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2-07 House Committee Lay Over Unamended <br /> <br />Page 41 of 49 <br /> <br />conduct an analysis available and appropriated waters within the <br />basin and propose projects for methods for meeting those needs <br />and utilizing those unappropriated waters where appropriate. This <br />is a tall order. While that sOli of internal basin assessment plan <br />development is what is needed to move forward, getting to that <br />point would require additional stmcture or framework that the <br />roundtables can work within, along with financial and technical <br />support for the assessment and plan development and <br />implementation process. <br /> <br />In talking about developing strategies for action we're talking <br />about development of a plan. In Colorado's water history plan has <br />often been seen as a four letter word. The idea of a state centered <br />and state driven planning process does not fit well in Colorado. At <br />the same time, without dialogue, cooperation and planning within <br />the _ basins we see the development and implementation of <br />strategies to meet state water needs brought to a standstill. <br /> <br />The state of Colorado, primarily through CWCB has long <br />stmggled to find its role in this process providing financial and <br />technical suppOli for water planning and management efforts <br />through individual loans and grants, as well as through larger <br />efforts, such as decision suppOli systems and information <br />collection prevented through the SWSI gap analysis. <br /> <br />In developing a framework we can support the move for the basin <br />roundtables from an advisory role to a leadership role within this <br />process, these other states as well as other processes within <br />Colorado provide some important lessons, particularly one the <br />inclusion of some sort of deadlines or milestones that provide an <br />incentive for the planning units to come together to find solutions <br />rather than using the process to prevent solutions from being <br />found. <br /> <br />Second that the individual basins would need to determine for <br />themselves which issues are preeminent and can be addressed <br />within a reasonable timeframe. For example, if there's a lawsuit <br />pending that may take certain issues off the table. However, clear <br />identification of the scope of the issues to be addressed within a <br />timeframe for each basin is critical. <br /> <br />Equally critical, perhaps more so is development of leaders within <br />the group who are committed to keeping the process moving <br />forward and can negotiate on behalf of the interest they are <br />representing. This includes water rights holders, present of <br />facilitators who can maintain an atmosphere of tmst and goodwill <br /> <br />www.escriptionist.com <br /> <br />Page 41 of 49 <br />