My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2-07 House Committee Lay Over Unamended
CWCB
>
IBCC Process Program Material
>
Backfile
>
2-07 House Committee Lay Over Unamended
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2009 6:00:42 PM
Creation date
7/25/2007 1:21:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
IBCC Process Program Material
Title
2-07 House Committee Lay Over Unamended
IBCC - Doc Type
Legislation
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />2-07 House Committee Lay Over Unamended <br /> <br />Page 40 of 49 <br /> <br />Madam Chair: <br /> <br />Ms'. Schreier: <br /> <br />Madam Chair: <br /> <br />Ms'. Schreier: <br /> <br />also augmenting stream flows in the process. With locally initiated <br />and locally led processes the development of these sorts of win- <br />win solutions is possible when the process is placed, as stated in <br />the Washington statute, in the hands of people who have the <br />greatest knowledge of all the resources and the aspirations of those <br />who live and work in the water shed and who have the greatest <br />stake in the proper long-term management of those resources. <br /> <br />Without including this local buy-in and suppOli including <br />voluntary participation by water rights holders, the chances of <br />acceptance for the outcome of these processes is diminished. <br /> <br />The second point I want to make - <br /> <br />-- waiting for you to get to our bill. <br /> <br />Okay. <br /> <br />Thank you. <br /> <br />Is that as has been noted, cooperation within the _ basins is <br />critical to moving forward to better water management within the <br />state, but an important factor in the compact development process <br />is the leadership by negotiation participants can be seen as <br />representing of their stakeholder groups and to make commitments <br />on behalf of those groups or at least secure the commitments of the <br />groups they're representing. <br /> <br />In the SWSI process local input was involved from the basin <br />technical roundtables, it provided input, it was selected by the state <br />consultants and the roles were primarily advisory to the process. <br />The meetings were organized by the consultants who did much of <br />the talking at the meetings presenting PowerPoint slides on their <br />findings and are not analytical approaches, but it was not a process <br />driven by the local interests who had little incentive to act on the <br />basis of the findings of the study, a study that did identify issues <br />and collected important and valuable information, but did not lead <br />to the development of plans that would result in action. <br /> <br />Bringing these different water interests to the same table and <br />stimulating discussion is an impOliant step, but did not lead to <br />action in the basin nor guidance for the individuals representing the <br />basin in inter-basin discussions. <br /> <br />Article 37 75104, the bill, does discuss a requirement that the basin <br />roundtables develop a basin wide water supply needs assessment, <br /> <br />www.escriptionist.com <br /> <br />Page 40 of 49 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.