My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2-07 House Committee Lay Over Unamended
CWCB
>
IBCC Process Program Material
>
Backfile
>
2-07 House Committee Lay Over Unamended
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2009 6:00:42 PM
Creation date
7/25/2007 1:21:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
IBCC Process Program Material
Title
2-07 House Committee Lay Over Unamended
IBCC - Doc Type
Legislation
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />2-07 House Committee Lay Over Unamended <br /> <br />Page 11 of 49 <br /> <br />It's just well-suited to do that job because all of this will, if this <br />goes forward, we'll be doing this together and it'll all be done at <br />the state level probably through the Department of Natural <br />Resources, in part through CWCB, which is the parent for the <br />SWSI effort. Then whatever groups are put together here. There <br />will be no reason for duplication. We can coordinate those at <br />every turn for dollar efficiency and for subject matter efficiency. <br />So I do see those as being complementary and not duplicating. <br /> <br />So that's essentially in summary of how we've come to this. It <br />already is doing what it was designed to do. It's already started a <br />conversation along the lines of there may be a better way. We can <br />use this successful process in history, the Colorado River compact <br />process, and Del Carpenter's ideas and goals. We don't have to <br />reinvent that. We can learn from that and build on top of it. He <br />performed the impossible in his time. We can perform it again, but <br />we have something he didn't have. We have him and his memory <br />and his success to build on. <br /> <br />I think there's every reason for us to go forward this way. We've <br />been talking about with a lot of people. The general attitude is <br />very interesting idea; let's talk some more. <br /> <br />Now this is a very fragile process. There's no question about that. <br />Anything you do in water in Colorado is high risk business. I <br />understand that. Almost anyone can derail this process at any <br />point for any good reason, but my question is why. Why wouldn't <br />we do this? Why wouldn't we be willing to have these <br />conversations? <br /> <br />I have a great belief in the wisdom and ability of people out on the <br />ground in every community. What I want to see is for them to <br />have an oppOliunity to really put their ideas and thoughts on the <br />table. We're not trying to dictate conclusions here. Quite the <br />opposite. We're trying to nurture new decisions developed at <br />home and then sOlied out with neighbors. This is a process that <br />can do that. It's a long-term effort because real water solutions in <br />Colorado will take time. This one is designed to start now and get <br />us there in time. <br /> <br />Madam Chair: <br /> <br />Representative Rose. <br /> <br />Rep. Rose: <br /> <br />Thank you, Madam Chair. <br /> <br />George. <br /> <br />Russell George: Thank you. <br /> <br />www.escriptionist.com Page 11 of 49 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.