My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2-07 House Committee Lay Over Unamended
CWCB
>
IBCC Process Program Material
>
Backfile
>
2-07 House Committee Lay Over Unamended
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2009 6:00:42 PM
Creation date
7/25/2007 1:21:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
IBCC Process Program Material
Title
2-07 House Committee Lay Over Unamended
IBCC - Doc Type
Legislation
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />2-07 House Committee Lay Over Unamended <br /> <br />Page 10 of 49 <br /> <br />made it clear in those days that all decisions need to be made in the <br />first instance upon data and they did well with what they had. <br /> <br />Well, we can do that again today. That's what SWSI is all about. <br />That's the first step is get the data, find out what we have and what <br />we need. This is the next step. This is an invitation given by the <br />state in its role to anyone who will come to the table and talk about <br />these issues. We will ask for the same ingredients to be put on the <br />table. Come in good faith, be willing to openly look at the next <br />level, put the litigating possibilities aside, put the local self- <br />interests aside for the moment. Come to the table and look. <br />Here's what I need; here's what I'm willing to give. <br /> <br />In the first instance we can do it from an inter-basin side. Two <br />basins talking; three or more; or are there areas within a basin that <br />need to have the same conversations. The difference in some ways <br />between this idea and some of what we see in some places in the <br />state today is this one invites us and encourages us to recognize <br />that virtually any decision made anywhere in the water business in <br />this state is going to impact and have a connection to the other <br />basins. There's an interconnectedness that we always haven't <br />acknowledged. This process will invite us to do that. <br /> <br />Now we started the bill that you have in front of you in a simple <br />form. We intentionally tried not to put too much meat on the <br />bones, but we wanted to have a pretty real process skeleton in <br />place. That's what we've brought to you so far. <br /> <br />Now the risk in that of course is that when things are left unsaid, it <br />invites people to worry about what does that mean. That's fine <br />because the whole idea here is that we set the table, but we invite <br />the people who come to the table to tell us what needs to be on it. <br />Who needs to be there to make decisions. We wanted that to be <br />made out in the local communities. We're dignifying local <br />involvement, local decision-making in its completest form. The <br />state is dictating nothing. The state is setting in motion a voluntary <br />process. We think it's our responsibility to underwrite this process <br />wherever people across the state want to do it. Bring the resources <br />to the table. <br /> <br />In the first instance we bring the SWSI data as we have it and the <br />SWSI data as we generate as time goes forward. The question was <br />asked how does this relate to SWSI. Hand in glove; SWSI is <br />moving forward whether or not this does. That's why there might <br />appear to be some overlapping because until they're both in motion <br />we have to keep SWSI as it's designed. It's a matter of statute. <br /> <br />www.escriptionist.com <br /> <br />Page 10 of 49 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.