Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. -- Inventing options for mutual gain: separate this phase form the decision <br />making phase; suspend judgment temporarily; save conclusions and proposals <br />until later <br />. --Options you Offer: don't defend them; ask for advice on improvement; <br />rework them; articulate disadvantages as well as advantages <br /> <br />. --Obstacles to interest based negotiation: judging too early; looking for one <br />answer <br />. --Key: Collaborate: work together, co-labor <br /> <br />Paradoxes: Silver Fox of the Rockies: Delph Carpenter <br />1) Prior appropriation doctrine best way to appropriate water <br />2) But upper basin states should get to use water that originates in their won <br />backyard. <br /> <br />Reference to Todd Brian: CU: how do we learn how to solve paradoxes; rejoin the <br />two sides and then investigate how to solve paradox <br /> <br />. --Constmctive Engagement: <br />. --Market, state, social auditors: main challenge is to shift perceptions <br /> <br />. --Don't start with allocation: that becomes a zero sum game <br />. --Find lateral thinking solutions <br />. Not just the quantify of water but the benefits of water <br />. Integrative schemes instead of distributive schemes <br />. Open doors and minds by asking others about their interests <br />. Build package of interest and triangulate interests <br /> <br />What we want to change is: <br />DAD: decide announce defend <br />We want: <br />Constmctive engagement not DAD <br />Typical way of working water projects in this country <br />I.e.: Two Forks... <br /> <br />Constructive Engagement: <br />Decide with consideration for what might help satisfy the <br />Constmctive Engagement: <br />MOMS <br />Maximize Opportunities for Multifaceted Solutions <br /> <br />Water problem: all stakeholders to table; package of solutions <br />This can be challenging to those who have typically been DAD <br /> <br />Can learn how to do it: <br />Skill and art; takes training; practices; <br /> <br />4 <br />