Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. _".26 '94 16.30 <br /> <br />ccs <br /> <br />TEL 3038745342 <br /> <br />P. 2 <br /> <br />PLAN OF STUDY <br />LEROUX CREEK WATER USERS ASSOCIA nON <br />"- <br /> <br />STUDY OBJECTIVE <br /> <br />The purpose of the study would be to find locations which were technically, <br />environmentally, and politically feasible to store additional water. The Association has <br />more water rights than it is currently able to store there each of its stockholders would <br />see getting less water than they should. Tbe Association would like to consider <br />renovating some abandoned reservoir sites, construct a new reservoir, or enlarging some <br />of its existing reservoirs to store more water. The study will be used to determine <br />which options are best for storing more of their water rights and if storing more water <br />is feasible. . <br /> <br />STUDY PLAN <br /> <br />The study would involve field inspections of sites which the owners consider most likely <br />to be viable based on their assessment of basin and watershed. Initial investigation <br />would be a site visit with a hand level and tape to get an idea of feasibility. If the area <br />looks viable after the initial site visit, the US Forest Service would be contacted to see <br />if they had any overriding objections to development at the site. If not, a survey crew <br />would perform field work necessary to creat a topographic map of the existing <br />conditions. The survey data would be reduced and a topographic map developed of the <br />existing site and the proposed site with the dam. Calculations would include a volume <br />of water stored per foot of depth, volume of dirt needed to construct a dam of "x" <br />height, cost estimate for construction. and operations for the most viable heights, and a <br />cost per acre foot of water for the most viable options. This information would be <br />presented to the owner for their review with a report which includes the above data and <br />our analysis of the data. The Association is looking not for one correct answer but for <br />as many locations as possible which are feasible. <br /> <br />TASKS <br /> <br />1. Identify initially viable alternatives. <br /> <br />The Owners spend a great deal of time working on the Forest Service property in their <br />drainage. When they identify sites which might work to store additional water and has <br />the capacity to consistently fill with water, they discuss it among themselves and if <br />several of them think it has potential, they request that an engineering assessment be <br />made of the site. Sites are eliminated from further consideration if there are institutional <br />or environmental problems. This task is accomplished mostly by the Owners themselves <br />at no charge to the Association. As part of the initial identification, the Forest Service <br />is also contacted to see if they 'have any objections.. This takes a phone call and is <br />sometimes done by the Owners or can be dorie by the Engineer. <br /> <br />CD <br />