My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00168 (2)
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00168 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:46:14 PM
Creation date
7/6/2007 10:38:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/22/2007
Description
ISF Section - ISF Rule 7 - Inundation of ISF Rights
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <,.= .. <br />. <br /> History and Background of ISF Rule 7 <br /> Impetus for addressing inundation of ISF water rights formally: <br /> . Board had filed SOPs to proposed inundations in several cases <br /> . One case was set for trial, scarking the question of what Board's <br /> policy on inundation should e. <br /> . In early 1990, CWCB Director Bill McDonald requested public input <br /> on two questions: <br /> - "Whether the Board should file Statements of Opposition to <br /> applications for conditional storage rights if the conditional right <br /> sought would result in inundation of a stream :p'ment upon <br /> which the Board holds an ISF appropriation, an , <br /> - Were statements of opposition to be filed, what terms and <br /> conditions it can and should seek to protect its ISF <br /> appropriation?" <br /> . This re~uest initiated the len~th~ public process leading to adoption <br /> of the I F Rules, including I F ule 7. <br />. <br /> -. <br /> Issues Raised in Public Rulemaking Process <br /> . Wide range of opinions on how the Board should treat inundation <br /> . Assertions of water development interests: <br /> - Inundation is never injury. <br /> - The Board has no statutory authority to prevent inundation. <br /> - Proposed rule constituted a "taking." <br /> . Assertions of environmental advocates: <br /> - Inundation alwavs constitutes injury to an ISF water right. <br /> - The Board has no statutory authority to allow such injury. <br /> . During public review period, questions raised on the constitutionality <br /> and legality of the proposed rule regarding inundation <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.