Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, ;1' '. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Issues Raised in Public Rulemaking Process <br /> <br />Attorney General's Office informal legal opinion on issues: <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />- Inundation rule is within the scope of the statutory authori~ <br />delegated to the Board by the General Assembly in establishing <br />the ISF Program. <br />- The CWCB could not accomplish the mission of the ISF <br />Program without the ability to protect its ISF water rights from <br />proposed actions that would defeat the purpose for which the <br />ISF water rights were appropriated. <br />- Inundation rule did not constitute a taking because <br />· in majority of cases, its application would not prohibit all <br />economic beneficial use of the subject property, and <br />. inundation is prohibited by underlying provisions of water, <br />tort and property law. <br /> <br />- The ISF Rules, including ISF Rule 7, do not violate or modify any <br />existing statute. <br /> <br />Adoption of the Rules <br /> <br />· After consideration of all publiC input and two informal legal opinions <br />of Attorney General's Office, the Board adopted the ISF Rules, <br />including ISF Rule 7. During this process, the Board: <br /> <br />- Concluded that inundation of all or a portion of an ISF stream <br />reach may be an interference with the Board's usufructuary <br />rights which were confirmed by the ISF decree. <br /> <br />- Considered its decree for an ISF water right to represent a <br />property right to be used to preserve the natural environment to <br />a reasonable degree. <br /> <br />- Recognized both dewatering and inundation as potential injuries <br />to ISF water rights. <br /> <br />8 <br />