My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Colorado River Subunit and Law of the River Me
CWCB
>
Interbasin Compact Committee
>
Backfile
>
Colorado River Subunit and Law of the River Me
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2009 11:55:02 AM
Creation date
6/22/2007 4:02:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Interbasin Compact Committee
Title
Colorado River Subunit and Law of the River
Date
6/19/2007
Author
James Eklund
Interbasin CC - Doc Type
Presentations
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
S L R <br />UMMARY OF THE AW OF THE IVER <br /> <br />The Law of the River is a complex tapestry of interstate compacts, federal law, and <br />agreements. The basic threads of the Law of the River are: <br /> <br /> Colorado River Compact (1922) <br />— apportions water betwee n the Upper and Lower <br />Basins (7.5 million acre - feet to each) with the requirement that the Upper Division not <br />deplete the flow of water below an aggregate of 75 million acre - feet over any period of <br />ten consecutive years . <br /> Boulder Canyon Project Act (1928) <br />— a llocat es Lower Basin water among Arizona, <br />1 <br />California, and Nevada ; authorized construction of Hoover Dam and the All - American <br />Canal. <br /> California Limitation Act (1929) <br />— obligates California to limit its use to 4.4 million <br />acre - feet. <br /> California Seven - Party Agr eement (1931) <br />— divided 5.3 million acre - feet of water <br />among seven large California water users. <br /> United States - Republic of Mexico Water Treaty (1944) <br />— allocates 1.5 million acre - <br />feet of water to Mexico plus an additional .2 million acre - feet if there is a sur plus; <br />requires Mexico to share shortages that are due to "extraordinary drought" in the United <br />States. <br /> Upper Colorado River Basin Compact (1948) <br />— apportions water between Arizona (.05 <br />million acre - feet), Colorado (51.75%), Utah (23%), Wyoming (14%), and <br />New Mexico (1 1.25%) and creates the Upper Colorado River Commission. <br /> Colorado River Storage Project Act (1956) <br />— assists the Upper Basin States in <br />developing storage projects to ensure Compact deliveries (e.g. Glen Canyon, Flaming <br />Gorge, Aspinall, Navajo). <br /> decision and decree (1963 and 1964) <br />Ariz ona v. California — sustains federal claims on <br />behalf of Lower Basin American Indian tribes and interprets the BCPA as allocating <br />water among Ar izona (2.8 million acre - feet) , California (4.4 million acre - feet) , and <br />Nevada (.3 million acre - feet) . <br /> Colorado River Basin Project Act (1968) <br />— authorized construction of the Central <br />Arizona Project and states that, in times of shortage, California use takes priority over <br />any Central Arizona Project use; directs the Secretary of the Interior to propose Long <br />R ange Operating Criteria for the reservoirs. <br /> Operating Criteria for Colorado System Reservoirs (1970) <br />— targets a delivery of 8.23 <br />million acre - feet from Lake Powell to Lake Mead (note that this is not required by the <br />Compacts); co ntemplates an annual review and plan taking into account water in storage <br />and anticipated runoff. <br /> <br /> <br />A s interpreted and decreed by the Supreme Court in Arizo na v. California . <br />1 <br /> <br />373 U.S. 546 (1963) (decision), 376 U.S. 340 (1964) (decree), ___ U.S. ___, 126 S.Ct. 1543 <br />2 <br /> <br />(2006) (consolidated decree) . <br /> <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.