My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
LPPD000384
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
LPPD000384
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2011 11:23:36 AM
Creation date
3/26/2007 10:33:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C150180
Contractor Name
Pinewood Springs Water District
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
4
County
Larimer
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />"'-_.. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />,...:...,...'...... <br />"",.-'\, <br />, <br />." <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Another common disadvantage is that a reservoir at any of these sites would be <br />a new presence in an established residential neighborhood, requiring real pro- <br />erty acquisition, but such acquisition costs have been inCluded in the overall <br />cost estimate for each. In. addition to the these disadvantages common to all <br />four Crow Lane sites, is the following summary of other advantages and dis- <br />advantages unique to each. <br /> <br />Crow Lane #1-35' high dam <br /> <br />Advantage: On a conceptual basis, this alternate offers the most capacity ( 51 <br />acre/feet) of all of the other alternates considered, including "A", "B", and <br />"C", and the other Crow Lane alternates. It also has the lowest cost per <br />acre/foot of all of the alternates. <br /> <br />Disadvantage: This reservoir will require the relocation of a segment of the ex- <br />isting treated water distribution system, as well as an existing septic system, <br />both currently beneath the proposed reservoir site. <br /> <br />Crow Lane #1 ~20' high dam <br /> <br />Advantage: Requires approximately 40% of the area to be acquired for the 35' <br />high dam. <br /> <br />Disadv~tage: Yields only 12 acre/foot of storage representing a unit cost per <br />acre/foot almost four times that of the 35' high dam. Also requires relocation of <br />existing water line and septic system. <br /> <br />Crow Lane #2-35' high dam <br /> <br />Advan~e: Requires very littlerelocatio~ of the existing' water line, and none <br />of the existing' septic system. <br /> <br />Disadvanta1!:e:. Requires acquisition of an existing residence, in addit~on to <br />land. Requires relocation of existing pump station. <br /> <br />Crow Lane #2 -20' high dam <br /> <br />Advantage: Does not require purchase of an existing residence. <br /> <br />Disadvantage: Has the smallest capacity and the highest cost per acre /foot of <br />all Crow Lane alternates. <br /> <br />30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.