My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CPN Audit/Rainwater Applic
CWCB
>
Water Efficiency Grants
>
Day Forward
>
CPN Audit/Rainwater Applic
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2011 1:49:52 PM
Creation date
1/31/2007 10:05:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Efficiency Grants
Water Efficiency Grant Type
Water Conservation Implementation Grant
Contract/PO #
OE PDA 07-20
Applicant
Castle Pines North Metropolitan District
Project Name
Sustainable Management in Northwest Douglas County
Title
Grant application for Water Efficiency Study
Date
3/15/2005
County
Douglas
Water Efficiency - Doc Type
Application
Document Relationships
Castle Pines North WC Plan2007
(Message)
Path:
\Water Conservation\DayForward
CPN Audit/Rainwater 95% ProgReport
(Message)
Path:
\Water Efficiency Grants\Day Forward
CPN Audit/Rainwater Approval Ltr
(Attachment)
Path:
\Water Efficiency Grants\Day Forward
CPN Audit/Rainwater Final Report
(Attachment)
Path:
\Water Efficiency Grants\Day Forward
CPN Audit/Rainwater PO
(Attachment)
Path:
\Water Efficiency Grants\Day Forward
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />calculate the water balance under the native vegetation scenario, a water balance for <br />developed areas employing rainwater conservation will be determined. <br /> <br />Task 5. Quantify Potential Water Savings from Conservation Practices <br /> <br />Potential water savings from implementing efficient landscaping, improving irrigation <br />system efficiencies, and implementing rainwater conservation practices will be <br />approximated. <br /> <br />Task 6. Quantify Differences in Return Flows <br /> <br />The next phase of the project will quantify the differences in water balances between the <br />native vegetation scenario and that of a development using rainwater conservation. <br />Specifically, the study will identify any differences in time, place, quantity, and quality of <br />return flows. This will allow a replacement volume to be calculated as well as <br />identifying the nature and timing of the substitute supply. <br /> <br />Task 7. Develop Sample Augmentation Plan <br /> <br />The final work phase of the project will result in the development of a sample <br />augmentation plan that will identify the structures, diversions, beneficial uses, timing, <br />and amount of depletions to be replaced, along with how and when the replacement water <br />will be supplied, and how the augmentation plan will be operated9. From this plan, an <br />algorithm can be extracted that could be applied to future applications of rainwater <br />conservation throughout Colorado. The plan would also identify potential entities and <br />means of providing replacement water. <br /> <br />Task 8. Prepare Project Report <br /> <br />The ET data, water balances under each scenario, infrastructure requirements, economic <br />evaluation, potential water savings under conservation scenarios, and sample <br />augmentation plan outline will be summarized in a public report that will allow sound <br />policy to be developed for Colorado. Written progress reports will be provided to the <br />Peer Review Committee at approximately 50% and 95% completion of the study. A final <br />report, incorporating comments from the Peer Review Committee will be the ultimate <br />work product for this study project. <br /> <br />Task 9. Project Management <br /> <br />Components of project management will include tracking work accomplished, <br />maintaining budget and schedule, regularly reporting the status of work activities, and <br />promote communication between all parties contributing to this study. <br /> <br />An additional component of a successful study will be the inclusion of a two-part review <br />process: I) review by a Project Advisory Committee consisting of individuals who will <br /> <br />9 Colorado Foundation for Water Education, Colorado Water Law, 2003 <br /> <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.