Laserfiche WebLink
<br />60 <br /> <br />JOURNAL OF WEATHER MODlF1CA nON <br /> <br />Volume 38 <br /> <br />Natural ice activation is simulated using a gener- <br />alization of the Meyers et al. (1992) fonnula: <br /> <br />Nj= NIFNexp[12.96(SI- 1)]; <br />T<-5C,' r >r. <br />v SI <br /> <br />supersaturation with respect to ice, and <br /> <br />T<-2C', r >r <br />v rw <br /> <br />supersaturation with respect to water. <br /> <br />The variable NIFN is a forecast variable in RAMS <br />which can vary both vertically and horizontally <br />whenever such data are available. Normally we use <br />measurements in field campaigns with the CSU con- <br />tinuous flow diffusion chamber to infer NIFN. In the <br /> <br />" <br /> <br /> <br /> - <br />. <br />'0 ~ <br />N <br /> - <br />. <br /> <br />. , I I <br /> <br /> <br />~ <br />1'tR"rf.'J181t" "",.nIl','. f'l1."<< <br /> <br />.....;r~.. ftttI. <br />MtII:ra1 Uaft u __ flail CMlUUau <br />_ .. t-.I J.n <br />:: .........m_ <br />- ..~.... <br />.. c.ut ...n <br />== _...ta.lS2~ <br />= ~..... 0 <br /> <br />_... D <br /> <br />(" 2l9lI'" .... <br />.'41 ..,.,,, ... nw <br />"l~ to J-no<92 <br />6-1-11 6-lf.1I <br />ftU n.OW a <br />NAlU..... llWT 0 <br /> <br />absence of those measurements N1FN is based on the <br />estimates reported in Meyers et al. (1992) and al- <br />lowed to drop off in concentration with height consis- <br />tent with observed lapse in large aerosol concentra- <br />tions. Recent measurements at the Stonn Peak Labo- <br />ratory in the Park Range of Colorado by DeMott <br />(personal communication) suggest that IFN concen- <br />trations are probably lower than Meyers original es- <br />timates. However, sensitivity experiments using these <br />lower background IFN values did not change the re- <br />sults appreciably. <br /> <br />Secondary ice particle production by the rime- <br />splinter mechanism following Mossop (1976) is also <br />simulated. <br /> <br />A seeding algorithm was added into the model <br />based on sources of IFN from ground-based seeding <br />generators. Figure 2 shows the activation data that we <br />used to simulate IFN production at each generator <br />site. Agl was then added as another prognostic IFN <br />field. <br /> <br />. I' . <br /> <br />I <br />1ft' ..'''' <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />IHII t..u __ ~ .n. <br />G AaI .. l.UI -.& .. "."1: IK'.~ ~ <br /> <br /> <br />-10 " <br />(t.OUD ........1\11I& fIItl <br />- Reviewed - <br /> <br />= <br /> <br />:: <br /> <br />== <br /> <br /> <br />Figure 2. Calibrated Agl activity for the <br />generators used by WWC. The dashed line <br />labeled "1973 max," including the acetone- <br />induced activation enhancement at wanner <br />temperatures, is the fit used in the model. <br />Provided by Larry Hjennstad. (WWC <br />used a 4% AgI solution with sodium iodide <br />as a carrier in acetone along with 1 % moth <br />balls to improve nuclei activation between <br />-2.5.C and -8.0.C.) <br /> <br />= <br />= <br />