Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />58 <br /> <br />JOURNAL OF WEATHER MODIFICA nON <br /> <br />Volume 38 <br /> <br />Simulations of Snowpack Augmentation <br />in the Colorado Rocky Mountains <br /> <br />William R. Cottonl, Ray McAnelly', Gustavo Carri61, Paul Mielke', and Curt Hartzell2, CCM <br /> <br />IColorado State University <br />Department of Atmospheric Science <br />Fort Collins, CO 80523 <br />2631 Knoll wood Dr., Willmar, MN 56201 <br /> <br />Abstract. In this paper we summarize a project designed to evaluate the feasibility of using a mesoscale model to <br />support cloud seeding operations and the physical evaluation of seeding responses. The model used was the Colo- <br />rado State University Regional AUnospheric Modeling System (RAMS). RAMS provided forecasts of precipitation <br />and winds for the 2003-2004 winter season. Detailed evaluation of model forecast orographic precipitation was per- <br />formed for 30 selected operational seeding days. In addition, the model was run to emulate cloud seeding operations <br />performed by Western Water Consultants. It was shown that the model can be a useful forecasting aid in support of <br />the seeding operations. But, the model over-predicted precipitation, particularly on moist southwest flow days. This <br />was likely due to over-simulated convection when little or only relatively shallow convection actually occurred. The <br />model also exhibited virtually no seeding response in terms of precipitation. Possible reasons for that are discussed. <br /> <br />1.0 INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />The Colorado Weather Damage Modification <br />Program (WDMP) research project involved a physi- <br />cal evaluation of the Denver Water (DW) operational <br />winter orographic cloud seeding program in the cen- <br />tral Colorado Rockies for the winter season 2003- <br />2004 using the Colorado State University Regional <br />Atmospheric Modeling System (RAMS). The project <br />was piggy-backed onto the DW operational program <br />contracted by Western Water Consultants (WWC), <br />LLC. The target area was the Blue, Upper Blue, <br />Snake, Williams Fork, and Upper South Platte River <br />drainage basins above 9,000 feet elevation (see Fig- <br />ure 1). The area within the target boundary was <br />about 3,700 km2. From February 10 through March <br />2004 only the Upper South Platte River basin and. <br />along the Continental Divide above the Upper Blue <br />River basin was to be targeted. A collaborative gen- <br />erator network (funded by DW, ski areas, and other <br />entities) consisted of up to 56 generators that were <br />available for seeding operations. Using a finest grid <br />spacing of 3-km, RAMS was run first in real-time to <br />provide operational support to the DW cloud seeding <br />program. RAMS was subsequently rerun for the pe- <br />riod of operations with a number of improvements <br />derived from assessments of the real-time runs, and <br />then rerun with simulated seeding generators releas- <br /> <br />I Corresponding author address: William R. Cot- <br />ton, Dept of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State <br />University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1371, cot- <br />ton@atmos.colostate.edu <br /> <br />- Reviewed - <br /> <br />ing seeding material (AgI) at rates, time periods, and <br />locations consistent with the operational program <br />(Hartzell et al., 2(05). <br /> <br />In Section 2.0 we describe the RAMS setup, in <br />Section 3.0 we summarize the results from this pro- <br />ject, in Section 4.0 we provide an overall discussion <br />of the results and in Section 5.0 we provide recom- <br />mendations for future operations. <br /> <br />2.0 RAMS SETUP <br /> <br />The 2003-2004 prototype real-time forecast ver- <br />sion of RAMS@CSU was based on version 4.3. The <br />physics of the model is described in some detail in <br />Cotton et al. (2003). Briefly, the microphysics of the <br />model is a bulk microphysics scheme in which the <br />size-distribution of all hydrometeors is determined by <br />a prescribed generalized gamma distribution. In con- <br />trast to most bulk models, however, the physics is <br />explicitly represented by emulating a bin model in- <br />cluding explicit activation of cloud droplets and ice <br />particles on cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) and ice <br />nuclei (IN), stochastic collection among all hydrome- <br />teors using state-of-the-art collection kernels, and a <br />bin representation of sedimentation of hydrometeors. <br />The ice phase is composed of pristine or vapor-grown <br />ice crystals including a variety of habits defined by <br />temperature, snow which represents partially-rimed <br />vapor-grown ice particles, aggregates, graupel, and <br />hail or frozen raindrops. <br /> <br />