Laserfiche WebLink
<br />60 <br /> <br />JOURNAL OF WEATHER MODIFICA nON <br /> <br />Volume 38 <br /> <br />Natural ice activation is simulated using a gener- <br />alization of the Meyers et a1. (1992) formula: <br /> <br />Ni= NIFNexp[12.96(SI- 1)]; <br />T<-5C,' r >r. <br />v S1 <br /> <br />supersaturation with respect to ice, and <br /> <br />T<-2C', r >r <br />v 1W <br /> <br />supersaturation with respect to water. <br /> <br />The variable Nu''N is a forecast variable in RAMS <br />which can vary both vertically and horizontally <br />whenever such data are available. Nonnally we use <br />measurements in field campaigns with the CSU con- <br />tinuous flow diffusion chamber to infer NIFN. In the <br /> <br />'I <br /> <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />I I I I <br /> <br /> <br />:! <br /> <br />_ AJt101IUlW .,.,..nIt.u. ,,,',n.,.. <br />- .. 2lIIfII. ..... <br />...........t .. __ nw ,.at'" <br />== .. c-.. '.71 <br />:.... .. .Ut ..,... <br />.. ..,., ..... <br />u...tIIt ..n <br />== ...........,.,. <br />.= ............. 0 <br /> <br />_ PIit II <br /> <br />l. 20IItIlIr ..... <br />.141 IIIW'" ...... ,.. <br />1-11014f u 1-7JlIIft <br />'"t~f3 ,",n-n <br /> <br />IN n.QlIf g <br /> <br />_1U~ UIWT 0 <br /> <br />absence of those measurements NU'N is based on the <br />estimates reported in Meyers et al. (1992) and al- <br />lowed to drop off in concentration with height consis- <br />tent with observed lapse in large aerosol concentra- <br />tions. Recent measurements at the Storm Peak Labo- <br />ratory. in the Park Range of Colorado by DeMott <br />(personal communication) suggest that IFN concen- <br />trations are probably lower than Meyers original es- <br />timates. However, sensitivity experiments using these <br />lower background IFN values did not change the re- <br />sults appreciably. <br /> <br />Secondary ice particle production by the rime- <br />splinter mechanism following Mossop (1976) is also <br />simulated. <br /> <br />A seeding algorithm was added into the model <br />based on sources of IFN from ground-based seeding <br />generators. Figure 2 shows the activation data that we <br />used to simulate IFN production at each generator <br />site. AgI was then added as another prognostic IFN <br />field. <br /> <br />. " . t <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />IH10 t_ __ ... 1IttIo. <br />a ... .. 1.. ., .. ..1. -- E <br /> <br /> <br />- <br />- <br />- <br /> <br />15 <br />et.oW ,.,..",.. jI('J <br />- Reviewed - <br /> <br />. . <br /> <br />!! <br /> <br />- <br />- <br /> <br /> <br />Figure 2. Calibrated AgI activity for the <br />generators used by WWC. The dashed line <br />labeled "1973 max," including the acetone- <br />induced activation enhancement at warmer <br />temperatures, is the fit used in the model. <br />Provided by Larry Hjermstad. (WWC <br />used a 4% AgI solution with sedium iodide <br />as a carrier in acetone along with 1 % moth <br />balls to improve nuclei activation between <br />-2.50C and -8.00C.) <br />