Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />7. In the cost estimate at the bottom of page 10, what does the Box Springs water right <br />include or consist of? A total cost should be provided at the bottom of the itemization. <br /> <br />8. Under Impacts on page II, what about the impacts of continued groundwater <br />withdrawls. If there is no impact, the report should say so. <br /> <br />9. Under Financial Plan on page 12, what does the CWCB review ofPreisser's financial <br />statement indicate? <br /> <br />10. Under Collateral on page 12, how much water is being offered? <br /> <br />The report is written in a manner that assumes the reader is familiar with the project and <br />associated documents. This is one way of preparing a feasibility report with little or no <br />regard for the reader. It is also a sloppy method of documentation since the feasibility <br />report is not then a stand-alone document. It would be necessary to obtain and review <br />several documents to obtain a full understanding as to what this project is all about. <br /> <br />Buying most of your documentation in appendices, or elsewhere, is bad enough but the <br />author of this report barely made an attempt to explain anything. In some cases, a few <br />sentences could have provided a lot of enlightenment. I wouldn't hesitate to send this one <br />back to the consultant. <br /> <br />2 <br />