My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00506 App Letter
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00506 App Letter
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:17:47 AM
Creation date
12/15/2006 4:17:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153824
Contractor Name
Preisser, Rodney J.
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
17
County
Lincoln
Bill Number
SPL
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Approval Letter
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />STATE Cf COLORI\DO <br /> <br />f) <br /> <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />721 Centennial Building <br />1 31 3 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone, (303) 866.3441 <br />FAX, (303) 866.4474 <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />Roy Romer <br />Governor <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Bill Stanton <br /> <br />James S. Lochhead <br />Executive Director, DNR <br />DariesC.lile,PE <br />Director, eWeB <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />Bill Green <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />August 4,1998 <br /> <br />RE: <br /> <br />Preisser Feasibility Study <br /> <br />I have reviewed the July 1998 Feasibility of an Augmentation Plan for Rodney J Preisser <br />by HRS Water Consultants and have the following comments and questions: <br /> <br />1. It might be helpful ifthe discussion of the need for the project were at the beginning <br />of the report. The reader has to wade through several pages before coming to the <br />reason for the loan request. Even then, the explanation given is not crystal clear. <br /> <br />2. The main question I have after reading the report is why an augmentation plan for a <br />non-tributary basin? There is very little here by way of overview to tell the reader <br />why this whole thing is taking place. <br /> <br />3. On page 4 under Need for the Project, there is the statement that Preisser intends to <br />sell land and water rights without an indication as to which lands and water rights. <br />This might sound like nit picking but it's typical ofthe lack of explanation throughout <br />this report. <br /> <br />4. In the second sub-paragraph on page 6, is the estimated loss of$120,000 to $130,000 <br />an annual figure? Where or how did they come up with the $1.0 million loss <br />estimate? There should be at least a sentence or two of explanation. <br /> <br />5. On page 8, what is the HCWUA and how does it relate to the Preisser augmentation <br />program if at all? <br /> <br />6. On page 9, there is almost no description of the Box Springs water right. Recognizing <br />that the Preisser plan may be somewhat different than a typical augmentation plan, <br />some explanation would still be useful. A reference to the Wheeler report seems to be <br />the only thing offered by way of evaluation. Why not provide at least some kind of <br />summary of that report. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.