My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12392
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
12000-12999
>
WSP12392
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:14:53 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:34:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.300.40.A
Description
Colorado River Compact
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
11/13/1922
Author
Co. R Compact Comm.
Title
Minutes of Colorado Compact Commission - Meeting #13
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />dont know exactly what the river will produce, but He do knOl'1 <br /> <br />that whatever it produces, storage Hill be necessary in order <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />to divide the aggregate of the Hater between the upper and the <br /> <br /> <br />'ltMer ba~in. NOl.], then, He may say that that river produces say <br /> <br /> <br />16 million acre feet and ,Ie \.fant to' give you 8 million. The '. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />upper states \.fould agree, say the upper basin would agree to <br /> <br /> <br />turn past Lee's Ferry 8 million acre feet annually provided <br /> <br /> <br />storage is provided so that He may control the river sufficiently <br /> <br />to give you that, but the people of the 10\.fer states would not <br /> <br />wish at this time to be compelled to build that storage if it <br /> <br />,!ere unnecessary just to fulfill some arbitrary agreement 1,1hereby <br /> <br />there must pass Lee's Ferry, whether used or not, a certain <br /> <br />number of acre feet annually. <br /> <br />Vffi. S. B. DAVIS: I dont like the idea of a joint guarantee <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />, by the upper states at all. It puts New J.iexico in this position, <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />assuming there is a guarantee of 5 million acre feet for the <br /> <br />sake of argument; that is more water than flows through Ne\.f <br /> <br />Nexico, and l.]e would not be in a position to sign a j oint guar_ <br /> <br /> <br />antee which the state itself could not carry out. It seems to me <br /> <br />from our standpoint that He would !>!ant something in the way of <br /> <br />an understanding as to just what portion of that Guarantee should <br /> <br />fall upon Ne\.f Nexico. <br />MR. NORVIE1:' Judge Davis has the idea of,co-partnership <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />in which each party is responsible for the whole debt. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />VIR. S. B. DAVIS: If the 5 upper states will guarantee to <br /> <br />the lower states, that is a joint guarantee. I have, no objection <br /> <br />13th - S.F. <br />35 <br /> <br />129 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.