Laserfiche WebLink
<br />interstate, like internationalst:rife, ~~;the result of heated <br />action. Ho.rever, if it is low erough' so that there would be <br />no question of ability to deliver and no danger of violation, <br />I can see no objection of putting some such proposition in as <br /> <br />an assurance against the exhaustion of the stream above to the . <br /> <br />detriment of the people below. <br />ViR. CALD~mLL: I can agree ,with that partially. If you <br /> <br />mean a miniJllUl1l flow guaranteed the 10.ler states .Ii thout any <br /> <br />further qualification, I dont think it would be wise, although <br /> <br />I think a guarantee could safely be made so far as the practi~ <br /> <br />cal divisions are concerned, A! guarantee or something that <br /> <br />, amounts to a guarantee, which is both a maxiJllUl1l and a minimum. <br /> <br />'A minimum to the lcwer states apd ,a maximum to the upper states. <br />That might be arrived at with some minor qualifications. <br /> <br />MR. CARJ?ENTER: Houldn't 1;hat really be an average? <br />MR. CALDvmLL: Not neoess~rily; it may be based on an <br />I <br />average and upon our knowledge Jor the river now. <br />MR, NORVIEL: By that you mean a certainpe:r:-centaga of the- <br /> <br />MR. CALD'NELL: No, not percentage. A certain amount. <br />HR, NORVIEL: A certain ajnount of acre feet of water to be <br /> <br />. i <br />used in the upper states w~tho~t any relation to the lower <br /> <br />states? <br /> <br />MR. CALD\'mL::.,: No. I mean this; there is a certain amcunt <br /> <br />of water which that river con~ributes which is unappropria1;ed. <br /> <br />, ' <br />vlhat we are 1;rying 1;0 do is 1;d give a portion of 1;ha1; wa1;er 1;0 <br />! . <br />1;he lower S1;a1;es, and reMin ~ portion for the upper states. He <br /> <br />13th - S.F. <br />34 <br /> <br />128 <br /> <br />128 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />