Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />if it is segregated as to just what I,am guaranteeing. It is <br /> <br />like asking me to sign a note of John D. Rockefeller if that <br /> <br />feature is ~1Orked out. <br /> <br />MR. NORVIEL: It seems to me thait w, are agreeing upon <br /> <br />the principle of a minimum flow and that the minilnum flow should <br /> <br />be established with a miniLnun annual flow and then that there be <br /> <br />a period of average, during which period another flow, larger <br /> <br />of course, should pass the point of demarkation. The establish- <br /> <br />ment of the latter we have not reach~d. <br /> <br />MR. HOOVER: You would not object to a ten year average if <br /> <br />there was a minimum for anyone yaar. <br /> <br />MR. NORVIEL: It would depend upon the minimum. If we <br /> <br />can have what ~Te demand, a fair minimu, ~Te might not raise the <br />period. HO~Te'Jer, I would not want to comlllit myself to that <br />until I have more time and discuss it, knovTing perhaps a little <br /> <br />better when I approximate the minimUm that shall be guaranteed, <br /> <br />Of course, the larger minimum flow, the longer the period we <br />might consider. <br /> <br />MR. HOOVEn: We can bring our second point do~m to this, <br /> <br />that the basis of average should be a tenn of years and a <br /> <br />minimum flow. <br /> <br />MR. NORVIEL: Yes, if '1e are to have a period at all then <br /> <br />there must be included in it a minimum flow. <br /> <br />MR. CALD\'JELL: I ~lould have to dissent from that, but I <br /> <br />'lOuld like to think the matter over. <br /> <br />MR. HOOVER: vIe might tentatively agree to that; the quanti- <br /> <br />13th - S.F. <br />36 <br /> <br />130 <br /> <br />130 <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />