Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I, <br /> <br />, The second table identifies potential events that'ccnild o(;curduring the CY.Here there are <br />also four (4) levels of communication, The entirety of these events deals with communication <br />between the respective staffs, but is broken up'into thoSe ,things that are being exchanged on a <br />daily, monthly, or as needed basis. ' <br /> <br />, -, , <br />'.! ~ .' ',' <br /> <br />As part of the discussions we had related to this topic, there were two (2) additional <br />Comments that were related to the communication that are shov.n at the bottom of the Events <br />within the compact year. <br /> <br />If additional events are identified, they should be appropriately placed on these-tables, It is <br />my understanding that these tables are to start a process that can be followed by the respective <br />staffs to ensure communication is occurring so that potential issues can be- addiessed as they <br />occur, I would appreciate any feedback that the OperatiOn Committee can provide, including <br />input on the level of communication the committee wants'to have on these events. <br /> <br />". <br />" <br /> <br />Water Issues Matrix <br /> <br />The issues identified ,on the matrix were placed into one of three different categories, <br />defmed as foUows: ' <br /> <br />"'J' , <br /> <br />, .. Legal- an: issue that is not resolvable at this tilne or withinARCA <br />. Policy - an issue that needs to have input Or guidance from either the Operation <br />Committee or ARCA ' " <br />. Technical- an issue that can be resolved by respective State staffs <br /> <br />During the process of review, a couple of issues were diopped from consideration and a couple'" <br />of iss'.les were added., It was also decided rather than refei:ring to the issues as they were <br />identified on the Agenda of the Special AReA Meeting held in'Ma)i'2002, the issues be <br />renumbered and possibly regrouped. 'I have since renumbered and tegiouped these issues. ' See, <br />Attacument If <br /> <br />Transit Losses of Kansas Deliveries' <br /> <br />The issue of how delivef)'-"deficlIs on Kansas Section IT wereto'be measured was <br />discussed. The Tom Leypaper was suITunarized which lead to a discussion ab0ut how deliveries <br />could'besimply measuied, The goal is to have a method J procedure to know that a delivery has' <br />been satisfied both ill volume' and flow rate: If not, theli the quantities would need to be ' <br />determined, The staffs will jointly work on this project with a goal of having something 'in place <br />by Apnll, 2004, Potential impediments were identified so that they-can be addiessed: The' <br />possibilitY ofhavmg a one (1) year agreement to test any method 0r procedure that might be <br />developed was cOilSidered, . ' , ., <br /> <br />It was determined that other issues rela1ed to transit loss would be deferred at this time, <br />This would include the issue of where delivery deficits would be replenished. <br /> <br />October 2003 Work Producr <br />PageZ'6f3 ' <br /> <br />Revision Date: 3\ October 2003 (9:24 am) , <br />Last printed 11/1312003 5:57 PM <br />