|
<br />'.
<br />.
<br />.
<br />.
<br />.
<br />.
<br />.
<br />I
<br />.
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />
<br />J..' ,.,'J,
<br />
<br />RECEIVED
<br />NO{ 7-21103' .
<br />f.,.." . ,'"
<br />DIVISION E:NGINEE:R
<br />PUEBLO,CClbPAoo
<br />
<br />',.
<br />KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE .
<br />- ". " ' Division of Water Resourc~
<br />Garden City Field Office
<br />
<br />. "
<br />
<br />:.,""
<br />
<br />MEMORANDUM
<br />
<br />"'J
<br />
<br />., .
<br />
<br />TO: Jim-Rogers'."
<br />Dave Brenn .
<br />Robin Jennison .' d~
<br />
<br />
<br />FROM: ~=~~~:'Te~Y"
<br />
<br />DATE: November 13, 2003
<br />
<br />....'..'
<br />
<br />RE: Meeting between staffs .' .
<br />October 23'd and 24th, 2003
<br />
<br />d th . ,,, '.' ". '.','
<br />On October 23' and 24 , staff from Colorado Division II and the Garden City Field Office
<br />met in Pueblo, Colorado to discuss the following issues: process to improve coordinat~on and
<br />issue resolution, determination of transit losses, categorization of water issues matrix, and,. ,
<br />rotating the Operations Secretary Responsibilities between the states. In addition, Steve Milkr,
<br />CWCB, presented.a proposal concerning the evaporation of water from th~ JMR permanent pool.
<br />From this, three (3) work pro~ucts wc;re generated: tables of dates and commuilication levels,
<br />the water issues matrix, and a joint product to look at transit 10ssesofKnnsasdeliveries,
<br />especially Kansas Section,rr. . . . ""
<br />
<br />Datesal!d C~mml!lJication
<br />
<br />.' 'J . ." . .' ..' '. .,..':...: .
<br />The Operatiqns Committee asked us to lookat d~t~s in the. Compact Year (CY) where~ there'
<br />-~'.- - . ' " J . , ,
<br />were eveuts that warranted \?l)mmunication between. the respective state offices. We were' also""
<br />asked to look at which events may warrant communication with the Operations Committee. the
<br />, '. '. ,~
<br />stated goal was to establish a process to im!lrC''/e the c:-,=unication anJ resolv~ issues as they
<br />occur. Attached are two tables that identiiJ both set dates and other events during the year that
<br />may warrant some lev~l of communication. . S~'" Attacillnent ,1\.
<br />
<br />These two tables detail events that occur during the CY,. either those associated with a set
<br />date or events (hat may occur during th~year.' .Corn!nunication~as placed irito one (1) of four
<br />(4) le'.'~!s: 1) between OS and AOS, 2) withOperatio~sCommittee,:3)meeting bem,een staffs,..
<br />and 4) meeting \vith Operations Committee. Six (6) set dates associat(:d with specific events '.
<br />were identified. In.addition:,.three (3) meeting,dates were identified ~thiIl th~CY~Two (2) of
<br />these three (3) meet~gs v.:ould be between the iespective~s to di~~Us~operational issu~s' and.
<br />may also servet() identify amladdressemerging issues. The tl:Urd,meeting would be a regUlar
<br />scheduled meeting to address outstanding accounting issues ami any emerging (SSu.::s that , ".
<br />couldn't be resolved between the States. .., '" '. . ,
<br />
<br />;.- '!,
<br />
<br />Odobec2003 Work Product
<br />Page 1 of3
<br />
<br />Revision Date: 3-1 October,2003 C,!:24,arn)
<br />Last printed 11/13/2003 5:~j:PM
<br />
|