Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-OJ' <br /> <br />., <br />~. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />'--.. <br /> <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />Roy Romer, Governor <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />DIVISION OF WilDLIFE <br /> <br />AH EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPlOYER <br /> <br />Perry D. Olson, Director <br />6060 Broadway <br />Denver, Colorado 80216 <br />Telephone: (303) 297-1192 <br /> <br />:..\ <br /> <br /> <br />Karcn 29, 1993 <br /> <br /> <br />,. <br /> <br />, , <br />. :... <br /> <br />; ~ I . <br />~:; '." <br /> <br />,'" <br /> <br />;.-'~Hjl-:"'~ <br />-..' w Ii '.,,-- <br /> <br />For Wi/dJjfe- <br />For Peopk <br /> <br />Gene Jencsok <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />1313 Sherman St., Rm 721 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br /> <br />\~ 7-f\ <br />\ ' <br />\ '1 <br />\ <br />\ <br /> <br />Gene: <br /> <br />Pursuant to my discussion with Eddie regarding the Service "critical habitat" <br />recommendations, I am providing the following summary of issues the Division has <br />with the current Federal Rsgister recommendations. <br /> <br />1) Critical habitat: <br /> <br />a) We do not support the lOO-year floodplain designation for defining <br />critical habitat. <br /> <br />This designation will prohibit the Division from developing any recreational <br />fishing opportunity for cool- or warmwater fish speciee on the western slope <br />of Colorado. <br /> <br />b) We do not support the floodplain approach described in the Federal <br />Register as an appropriate or realistic method of defining critical habitat. <br /> <br />Critical habitat designation should be based on a defined quantity of <br />floodplain habitat needed for recurring use by the species' life stages <br />during the average life span of a year class, and made available at a <br />reasonable frequency during the fishee' life span by spring flooding. <br /> <br />2) Razorback sucker: <br /> <br />a) We agree with the Colorado and Gunnison river reach designations. <br /> <br />b) Nothing should be designated for the White River in Colorado. <br /> <br />c) No critical habitat should be designated in the Yampa river above the <br />lower few miles containing the presumed spawning habitat. <br /> <br />3) Bonvtail. There is no data to justify designating critical habitat for this <br />species. only implementation of a large-scale, scientifically-based <br />reintroduction program will permit us to determine if and where critical <br />habitat may exist for this species in the Upper Basin. <br /> <br />DEPARlMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, .Kcnoctb Salazar, E.xecutivc Director <br />Wll..DLIFB COMMISSION, FJdon W. Coopc~Larry M. Wrip~ Vice Cbairman-Loui. F. Swift, Secretary <br />Felix Chavez. Member-Thoma. M. Eve, Mcmbe~Rcbccc:.a Frank. Member-William R. Hepl'I. Member-George VanDcnBcl'l. Member <br />