My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11879
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11879
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:19:10 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:15:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.10.C.5
Description
UCRBRIP
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
1/1/1993
Author
USFWS
Title
Summary of Colorado River Foshes Critical Habitat Briefing
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~:r-<' <br /> <br />, <br />-- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />1993 <br /> <br />4) Colorado scuawfish: <br /> <br />a) The Yampa River should be designated up to river mile 120, not to the <br />city of Craig. <br /> <br />b) The upper limit for the White River should be Taylor Draw Dam based on <br />the Service opinion allowing this structure. <br /> <br />c) The Division does not support designating the Gunnison River above the <br />Redlands Power Diversion Dam to Delta, nor the Colorado River above the <br />Highline Diversion Dam to Rifle as critical habitat. <br /> <br />This is presently unoccupied habitat that, through experimental approaches, <br />may serve as occupied habitat for resident adult populations. If <br />experimental approaches prove successful, designation of these reaches as <br />critical may be warranted in the future. <br /> <br />Also for the record, we want to: <br /> <br />1) re-emphasize that the critical habitat designations, as well as all recovery <br />efforts, should be based upon established recovery goals for each species. <br /> <br />2) express the opinion that the information provided in the Federal Register, <br />Service information leaflets, and reference to FIMA maps was inadequate for the <br />purpose of soliciting comment. The critical habitat designations provided in the <br />Federal Register should have shown the lateral boundaries of floodplsin habitats <br />included based on the proposed 100-year floodplain criteria, and cite the data <br />sources supporting the biological basis for the 100-year floodplain designation. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />/}o-w- <br /> <br />Thoma~~. Nesler <br />Aquatic Nongame Wildlife <br />Program Administrator <br /> <br />cc: Division Recovery Team - Colorado River <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.