My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11795
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11795
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:18:54 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:10:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.114.A
Description
Dolores Participating Project
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
8/24/1984
Title
Montezuma Valley Journal Coverage of McPhee Dam Dedication
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
News Article/Press Release
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Stockholders <br />voted yes <br />7-1 at MVI <br /> <br />Support was overwhelming <br />from the citizens themselves <br />on the Dolores River Project. <br />First the Montezuma <br />Irrigation Co., one of the <br />main organizations par- <br />ticipating in the project, <br />voted seven to one for it on <br />Dec. 13, 1976. <br />Then, on Feb. 8, 1977, <br />voters in both Montezuma <br />and Dolores counties voted 20 <br />to one in favor of the project. <br />Montezuma Valley <br />Irrigation Co. (MVI) <br />stockholders by the hundreds <br />attended meetJn!is sponsored <br />by the Bureau of <br />Reclamation and the Dolores <br />Water Conservancy District <br />for more than two months to <br />volce opinions and criticisms <br />and to ask questions on the <br />Dolores Project. <br />In their annual meeting on <br />Dec. 13, some 300 to 400 MY! <br />stockholders packed the <br />American Legion Home in <br />Cortez, discussed the <br />proposed project and then <br />22,886 water share votes were <br />cast for the measure and <br />3,732 against, a majority of <br />86.5 per cent. <br />MY! will retain its 130,000 <br />acre-feet of direct stream <br />water rights and will get an <br />additional 13,700 acre-feet a <br />year from the project. <br />Cost to MVI will be a con- <br />tract for the additional water <br />and a guarantee that Its <br />system will be providing full <br />service year-round as well as <br />a new tunnel to replace the <br />present one built in the 1880's. <br />The payment will be over a <br />period of 50 years. <br />Further, the project won't <br />affect the l3O,OOO-plus acre- <br />feet of water already owned <br />by MVI, which will be <br />delivered without charge <br />through the new tunnel. <br />Direct flow charges, as <br />before, will be set by the MVI <br />stockholders at their annual <br />meetings. <br /> <br />What will be charged will <br />be the 13,700 acre-feet being <br />supplied under the project <br />contract as supplementary <br />water. <br />But, a stockholder doesn't <br />need to be obligated to buy <br />supplementary water. <br />MYI's tunnel, built in the <br />1880's, is sttu serving the <br />Montezuma Valley, including <br />the City of Cortez. But, of- <br />ficials point out, It has frac- <br />tures every year, the rocks fall and It Is dangerous for <br />theose who must go to work in <br />the tunnel. <br />Cost of the new tunnel, <br />some '12 million, Is <br />prohibitive for MVI to un- <br />dertake Itself, being as much <br />as the entire irrigation c0m- <br />Pany's participation in the <br />. Dolores Project. But the tun- <br /> <br />nel, now nearing completion, <br />will be paid back at a fixed <br />low payment over a period of <br />50 years, or possibly even <br />less, since the biggest part of <br />the project will be paid <br />through power sales from the <br />hydroelectric dams along the <br />Colorado River system. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.