My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11633
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11633
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:18:15 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:05:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.09
Description
Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powell
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
3/1/1994
Title
Comments regarding the Draft Biological Opinion on Operations of Glen Canyon Dam
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Biological Opinion
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />also noted that conservation recommendations, which may <br />implemented at the discretion of the action agency can be <br />included in a biological opinion. <br /> <br />Flooding <br /> <br />Important factors were listed as temperature, magnitude, and <br />duration of floods; the ratio of base flow to peak flow, timing <br />and frequency of the peak; and the rate of the hydrograph. <br /> <br />Floods were defined as: <br /> <br />- Maintenance: < 31,OOOcfs; = power plant capacity; estimated <br />occurance of once/year <br />Habitat building: 45,000+/-; 1/8 years <br />Uncontrolled: > 31,000 + tributary flow; turbid water; 1/100 <br />years <br /> <br />Timing, if controlled should tend to mimic a natural hydrograph. <br />Floods are important to create/maintain habitat. <br /> <br />Impacts from human induced changes to the environment are <br />cumulative, so thinking should not be focused on one type of <br />impact at a time. <br /> <br />Magnitude, duration, ratio of peak to base flow and rise/fall of <br />hydrograph scarcely if ever influences adult (>175mm) to a <br />detectable level. However, eggs and larva and juveniles are <br />affected. Therefore, the focus for developing recommendations/ a <br />reasonable and prudent alternative for removing jeopardy, and for <br />future research needs to be on recruitment/early life stages. <br /> <br />Most participants recommended that flushing and/or habitat <br />maintence flows be the shortest duration which would achieve <br />habitat maintence/building. However, flows should still mimic <br />the natural hydrograph, with the incorporation of the peak for <br />habitat maintenance/building. <br /> <br />The trend in response to floods in other canyons seems to be a <br />significant drop in catch rate of non-natives, but this is <br />followed by a recovery once high flows are reduced. Native fish <br />are better adapted to flood flows. It would take 3 orders of <br />magnitude over base to displace non-natives in Grand Canyon, <br />which is probably higher than anything we will ever see. <br /> <br />Controlled floods should be managed to minimize effects on strong <br />year classes. <br /> <br />Pood Ba.e <br /> <br />:2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.