My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11633
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11633
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:18:15 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:05:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.09
Description
Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powell
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
3/1/1994
Title
Comments regarding the Draft Biological Opinion on Operations of Glen Canyon Dam
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Biological Opinion
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />There is no evidence that current operations are causing food <br />base to become limiting for adults, impacts to earlier life <br />stages are unknown. <br /> <br />Because highly fluctuating flow have the highest amount of drift, <br />moderately fluctuating have less, and steady flow conditions <br />further decrease availability of drifting food, the decrease may <br />create potentially limiting conditions. <br /> <br />Temperature <br /> <br />The Little Colorado River (LCR) is probably at carrying capacity. <br /> <br />The production of humpback chub in the LCR may be sufficient to <br />maintain current population levels in the mainstem, but only <br />temperature modification can significantly increase population <br />numbers in the mainstem. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Flow manipulation ~ affect population, but temperature is a <br />more important factor. Cannot remove jeopardy without <br />temperature modification. <br /> <br />, <br />", <br />" <br /> <br />, <br />t';: <br /> <br />Some meeting participants recommended water for controlled floods <br />should come off the top of the reservoir, not through bypass <br />tubes, to achieve higher temperatures, which would require a full <br />reservoir. This type of release may transport some pelagic <br />species from the reservoir, but that should not be problematic as <br />these fish usually do not survive in riverine environments. <br /> <br />Further study of a multi level intake structure is warranted, <br />including further examination of the effects of warmer <br />temperatures on non-natives. <br /> <br />,~. <br />~-" <br /> <br />C' <br /> <br />11.', <br />[::: <br /> <br />'.:" <br /> <br />~:; <br /> <br />k: <br /> <br />Plow Variability <br /> <br />to. <br />'~~.' <br />,'t: <br /> <br />Flood flows should have some degree of randomness. <br /> <br />Fish are energetically disadvantaged if daily fluctuations <br />require movement. Habitat should be stabilized has much as <br />possible. <br /> <br />Minimal diurnal fluctuations is a desired goal. Daily <br />fluctuations of 5000 cfs occurred 5% of the time during pre-dam <br />flows. <br /> <br />".{e;: <br /> <br />:'.-:, <br />~ <br />~_i <br />r..-:: <br />~::~~ <br />:.-,~; <br /> <br />BaCkwaters/Sediment <br /> <br />Backwaters are important to native fish so operations should be <br />designed to ensure these habitats do exist. The relative <br />importance of backwaters may be increased in Grand Canyon due to <br />post-dam temperature lowering. <br /> <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.