Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. 1 January 1952 <br /> <br />. AWRBIAC PROCEDuRE GUIDE <br />VI. CATEGORIES OF ELEMENTS (CONT 'D) <br /> <br />:;) <br />'':> <br />i-'l' <br />-.J <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />'. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />in the 1950 Flood Control Act or as supplsmentary or supporting <br />sesmente of elements or units under Ia. Examplss mish t be sta te <br />action programs on foreatry, soil conservation, wildlife, drain- <br />ase, hydroelectric power production, etc. Other examples might <br />be passage of enabling legislation to permit establishment of <br />organized dietricts .for certain purpoees or to permit municipal- <br />.ities to perform certain functions, or to establish or. revise <br />. state water laws. Still other examples might be stats, municipal, <br />or district financial contribution to elsmsnts contained in Ia. <br /> <br />d. Elements or unite included in Ic would consist of <br />pointing out measures or action by individuale, or' groups of <br />individuals, outside of Government, necessary to attain the. ob~ <br />Jectives as set forth in the 1950 Flood Control Act directly, or <br />to fully realize the bsnsfits from element.e contained 1n Ia and. <br />Ic. Examples of thie misht consist of.opportunitiee for private <br />irrisation development, drainage, flood damase reduction, pollution <br />abatament, etc. Further examplae might be possibllities'.for in- <br />dustrial dsvelopment to fully utilize hydroelectric power..e.nd to <br />enhance agricultural econo~ so that Boil conservation will bs <br />facilitated. Still further examples might be land owner end oper-. <br />stor action in soil conservation, land improvement, land prepara- <br />, tion in connection with an irrisation project, etc. <br /> <br />e. Category II. There are a number of reasons why the <br />Inter-Asency CODlJllittee may not consider potential elsmenteor units <br />of the Comprehensive .Ftan feasible or. deeirable to be carried out <br />within the reaeonably near future. Some elements may prove to be <br />technically feaeible .but lack economic Justification.Under existing <br />economic conditions;:.the'nsed for the element or unl.t may not justi- <br />fy action thereon in the immediate future; or the costs and intan- <br />gible losses under present conditions might outweigh tangible and <br />intangible benefits. Others way be economically and technically <br />feaaible, but a clarification of intrastate or interstate problems <br />is requirsd prior to the initiation of activity. on that element or <br />unit. For example, local intereets may.not be willing and able to <br />fulfill conditions.of participation prescribed bi isw, an inter- <br />state compact may be needed on a stream, there may be sufficient <br />disagreement within a state over the . element so as to raiee a serious <br />question as to ita desirability, or lsgislative or administrative <br />action by the state or one of its local subdivisions will be neces- <br />sary before action by the Federal Government should be initiated. <br />There may be still other elements considered desirable from a local <br /> <br />VI-3 <br />