My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11573
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11573
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:18:04 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:03:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.766
Description
Gunnison River General Publications - Correspondence - Reports - Etc
State
CO
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Date
3/1/1993
Author
Unknown
Title
Scoping Report for the Gunnison River Contract - Analysis Notebook - Section I - Comments by Source
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />eDlsno <br /> <br />Public Scoping Comments, Gunnison River Contract, cont. <br /> <br />13c. <br /> <br />la. <br /> <br />,~~~~ <br /> <br />5. 12. Wild/scenic area is high-quality class under water standards. Need to maintain. If <br />water classification changes -- for example from class I (cold) to class I (warm), this would affect <br />discharge parameters. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />5. 13. Does Blue Mesa have minimum pool? Will Blue Mesa level be affected (lowered in <br />spring); need this information. ' <br /> <br />14a. 5. 13. Does Blue Mesa have minimum pool? Will Blue Mesa level be affected (lowered in <br />spring); need this information. <br /> <br />13c. 5. 14. Are tributaries affected? If so what is affect on water quality and discharge permits. <br />Presetit the water quality parameters in reports. <br /> <br />15c. <br /> <br />15d. <br /> <br />5. 15. <br />5. 16. <br />5. 16. <br />5. 17. <br />5. 17. <br />5. 18. <br />5. 19. <br />affect contract? <br /> <br />Concerned with effects on river otter, other furbearers. <br /> <br />,.:J> '.';:.\:... <br /> <br />Concerned with effects of sudden high flows on nesting waterfowl. <br /> <br />.'., >~..:"'.~' <br />. .:., :.:~. ~. <br /> <br />22. 5. 20. Local agencies are OK, but decisions are usually made in Washington D.C. or <br />Denver. Local input should be heavily weighted. <br /> <br />1ge. <br /> <br />12. <br /> <br />STUDY. <br /> <br />16b. <br /> <br />14a. <br /> <br />STUDY. <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />Is this a smoke screen to send water to Arizona or California? <br /> <br />21. <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />What is value ($) of water lost for future Colorado development because of contract? <br /> <br />22. <br /> <br />5. 22. <br />contract? <br /> <br />What is value ($) of water lost for future Colorado development because of <br /> <br />5. <br />less. <br /> <br />Sediment is less now because of reservoirs, therefore flushing flow amounts should be <br /> <br />23. <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />Study needed: loss of flatwater recreation losses vs. downstream (recreation). <br /> <br />24. <br /> <br />5. 24. <br />(recreation). <br /> <br />Study needed: loss of flatwater recreation losses Vs. downstream <br /> <br />22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.