My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11573
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11573
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:18:04 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:03:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.766
Description
Gunnison River General Publications - Correspondence - Reports - Etc
State
CO
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Date
3/1/1993
Author
Unknown
Title
Scoping Report for the Gunnison River Contract - Analysis Notebook - Section I - Comments by Source
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />00159'8 <br /> <br />0, <br /> <br />Public Seeping Comments, Gunnison River Contract, conI. <br /> <br />....." <br />.. ..... <br /> <br />... - - ~ <br /> <br />21. 4. 16. How can 'variable flow contract' be enforced? This is major concern. How is <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board involved -- need their approval of contract? <br /> <br />13b. 4. 17. National Park Service and Bureau of Reclamation should quantify impacts of any contract <br />deliveries and deliveries for endangered fish of water on existing water uses/rights in Gunnison Basin. <br /> <br />STUDY. 4. 17. National Park Service and Bureau of Reclamation should quantify impacts of any <br />co~tract deliveries and deliveries for endangered fish of water on existing water uses/rights in <br />Gunnison Basin, <br /> <br />17. 4. 18. Relationship of long-term WAPA power contracts and this contract: Will WAPA <br />contracts control what this contract does? <br /> <br />19. 4. 19. Cover interrelationships of other projects. i.e. AB Lateral, Dominquez, transbasin <br />diversions, Rocky Point (including use of downstream and senior water rights). <br /> <br />4. 20. <br />Ri ver? <br />4. 20. <br />River? <br />4. 20. <br />River? <br /> <br />How can Ridgway Reservoir (Dallas Creek Project) contrihute flows to Gunnison <br /> <br />.:";.:.l."~--';'~..- <br /> <br />19c. <br /> <br /><:':~r;:v <br /> <br />6. 4. 21. Western Colorado Congress concerned tbat: I) the primary purpose of contract, to <br />protect resources of Monument, not be lost; and 2) endangered fishes not be the deciding factor. <br /> <br />3a. 4. '21. Western Colorado Congress concerned that: I) the primary purpose of contract, to <br />protect resources of Monument, not be lost; and' 2) endangered fisbes not be tbe deciding factor. <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />22. <br /> <br />The needs of the Upper (Gunnison) Basin' should be considered within the seeping. <br /> <br />18d. <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />22. <br /> <br />The needs of the Upper (Gunnison) Basin should be considered within the seeping. <br /> <br />13a. <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />23. <br /> <br />Are Uncompahgre flows affected by the contract? <br /> <br />~::;~;::~;~r. <br /> <br />. '.';: <br /> <br />20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.