My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11573
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11573
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:18:04 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:03:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.766
Description
Gunnison River General Publications - Correspondence - Reports - Etc
State
CO
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Date
3/1/1993
Author
Unknown
Title
Scoping Report for the Gunnison River Contract - Analysis Notebook - Section I - Comments by Source
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />..:;:-:- o:~~ <br />Ji:'::-S(?? <br /> <br />..,' <br /> <br />,,:.:' <br />{;;;- ~:~~::~:) <br />. ;:.:.:~.~:.::' <br /> <br />.. ~. <br /> <br />'I ~, .i r " <br /> <br />001597 <br /> <br />Public Scoping Comments, Gunnison River Contract, cent. <br /> <br />22. <br /> <br />What level of environmental study will be performed? EA or EIS? <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />08. <br /> <br />8. <br /> <br />Fish: keep balance between trout and "fish with lips" (endangered native species). . <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />09. <br /> <br />15d. 4. 10. Flows: Trout Unlimited wants ecosystem view; don't base flow on anyone special <br />interest -- i.e. see study for Monument by Stanford/Ward on ecosystem approach. <br /> <br />STUDY. 4. 10. Flows: Trout Unlimited wants ecosystem view; don't base flow on anyone <br />special interest -- i.e. see study for Monument by Stanford/Ward on ecosystem approach. <br /> <br />8. <br /> <br />Give equal balance to river and reservoir recreation. <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />11. <br /> <br />12. <br /> <br />Give equal balance to river and reservoir recreation. <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />11. <br /> <br />14a. 4. 12. BLM lacks data on Forks area recreation use; has good dala on other river use. NPS <br />(needs better) data to assess impacts. Need to know Monument river use -- consider access from East <br />PortallRed Rocks. <br /> <br />STUDY. 4. 12. BLM lacks data on Forks area recreation use; has good data on other river <br />use. NPS (needs better) data to assess impacts. Need to know Monument river use -- <br />consider access from East PortallRed Rocks. <br /> <br />3b. <br /> <br />4. 13. In preliminary contract, p. 5, a 300 cfs minimum instream flow is mentioned. <br />National Park Service has reserved right. The National Park Service should not settle for 300 <br />minimum - should be increased to maintain ecosystem. Better minimum in the summer would be <br />400 - 500, this would help mitigate canyon flash floods/sediment problems. <br /> <br />l3b. 4. 13. In preliminary contract, p. 5, a 300 cfs minimum instream flow is mentioned. <br />National Park Service has reserved right. The National Park ServiCe should not settle for 300 <br />minimum -- should be increased to maintain ecosystem. Better minimum in the summer would be <br />400 - 500. this would belp mitigate canyon flash floods/sediment problems. <br /> <br />la. <br /> <br />4. 14. <br />studies)? <br /> <br />Will Crystal (outlets) prevent reaching upper flows (requested for endangered ,fish <br /> <br />9. 4. 15. Reserved right: Consider right for both Monument (1933) and its wilderness area <br />(1976). Since Blue Mesa right is 1957, how will this affect water deliveries? Contract should better <br />define reserved rights seniority and purposes. <br /> <br />3b. 4. 15. Reserved right: Consider right for both Monument (1933) and its wilderness area <br />(1976). Since Blue Mesa right is 1957, how will this affect water deliveries? Contract should better <br />define reserved rights seniority and purposes. <br /> <br />5. 4. 16, How can Rvariable flow contractR be enforced? This is major concern. How is <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board involved -- need their approval of contract? <br /> <br />19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.