Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />. , . , <br /> <br /> 17. <br />."-' <br />.~ <br />" <br />/ <br />r.Jl <br />iotI. <br />"""" 18. <br /> <br />Het)rings on H.h. 2206, 87th Cong., p.83. The depletions <br />assumed l~crein, on bilsis of the construction schedule, would <br />begin in 1970 from gravity canals and increase on a straight <br />line basis to 1930, and full depletion including pumping <br />system in 19tH. <br /> <br />Hearin~s on H.h. 2206, 87th Cong., p. 83, and Fryingpan- <br />1,rkans2s He-evaluation Statement of January 1960. Assumed <br />straight line increase in depletion 1968-1972. <br /> <br />19. Small Project Loan Application for Orchard City Irrigation <br />District. 1961, p. 55. <br /> <br />20 and 21. (See not" for item 4 thru 7) <br /> <br />The Lenver Post} June 27, 1962. <br />in depletion 1906-85. <br /> <br />23. House Doc. 461, 87th Cong., 2d Sess., pp. IV, XVIII, and <br />Schedule facinG p. 8. Assumed depletions to begin 1972, three <br />years earlier than indicated on construction schedule because <br />additional C.R.S.P. funds reported available by integration of <br />public and private transmission system. <br /> <br />22. <br /> <br />Assumed strai~ht line increase <br /> <br />24. House Doc. 487, 87th Cong., pp. 24 and facing p. 10. Full <br />depletion assumed to begin hith completion of construction. <br /> <br />25. Feasibility Report, Feb. 1962, pp. 2, 15. Full depletion <br />assumed to be~~in with completion of construction. <br /> <br />26. Feasibility Report,Feb.l962, pp. 47, 95. Depletion schedule <br />based on repayment and development period. <br /> <br />27. huedi Dam Iteport, H.Doc. 353 (1960) p. 37. Assumed that depletion <br />would increase in steps on the dates uiven in that report. <br /> <br />"',-,: <br /> <br />