Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />8. The Weld County site in addition to producing <br />9,000 to 13,000 acre-feet'more water shifts the <br />use of 17,000 acre-feet of water from the <br />North Sterling, Farmers-Pawnee, and some smaller <br />ditches in this reach to the Riverside and <br />BiJou ditches. <br /> <br />1952-1957 Time Level <br /> <br />1. There is sufficient demand below either site to <br />use all water developed. <br /> <br />2. The Weld County site reduces valley shortages <br />2,500 acre-feet more than the Narrows site. , <br /> <br />3. The Weld County site reduces Riverside and BiJou <br />shortages by 22,000 acre-feet - the Narrows site <br />by 11,000 acre-feet. <br /> <br />4. The Weld County site reduces shortages below the <br />Bijou and Riverside service areas by 33,000 <br />acre-feet - the Narrows site by 45,000 acre-feet. <br /> <br />Without provision for controlling BiJou Creek floods, the Weld <br />County site costs $7,000,000 more than the Narrows site. While <br />the Weld County site provides for a somewhat greater reduction <br />in valley shortages, its main effect is to reduce shortages in <br />an upstream area rather than a downstream area. These two <br />advantages of the Weld County site are not considered by the <br />Bureau sufficient to justifY an added expenditure of $7,000,000. <br />The Bureau of Reclamation is therefore again recommending the <br />Narrows site. <br /> <br />Before we go into some of the more important details of <br />the studies it would be advisable to go over the major study <br />criteria. <br /> <br />'Criteria for Narrows-Weld County Dam Site Selection Study <br /> <br />1. Basin water supply will be supplemented by return flows <br />resulting from municipal growth. <br /> <br />2. ~I needs will have first priority for use. <br /> <br />3. Use at highest possible elevatiOll permits more opportunity <br />for reuse of return flows. <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />