Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I 002199 <br />I <br />I <br />il <br />I <br />I <br />1 <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />II <br /> <br />3. Consideration of Recreation Land Classes <br /> <br />4. Availability of Investment Capital <br /> <br />5. Consideration of Associated Politico-Socio- <br />Economic Benefits. <br /> <br />6. Existing Agency Objectives and Responsibilities <br /> <br />As stated in the Recreation Advisory Council Circular <br /> <br />Chapter No.7, "It is important, . . that full consideration <br /> <br />be given to the private role," Since, however, private activi- <br /> <br />ties are carried out within the framework of public policy, the <br /> <br />private role can best be discussed after a review of the roles <br /> <br />suggested for Federal, State, and local governments. <br /> <br />1. Origin of the Visitor <br /> <br />If the origin of the visitors can be obtained, the <br /> <br />majority of the users or project beneficiaries may be identified, <br /> <br />If the area of benefit is widespread rather than concentrated, <br /> <br />then the selection of Federal direction and involvement would <br /> <br />seem more justified, Conversely, if the majority of project <br /> <br />users or potential users can be identified as originating from <br /> <br />a specific locality, then it would appear that a local entity <br /> <br />should be selected, <br /> <br />Some specialists believe that responsibility for recre- <br /> <br />at ion should be categorized by activity or by groups of activities, <br /> <br />For example, facilities for day-use activities would be provided <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />~l ~ <br /> <br />