Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />002200 <br /> <br />by local entities and overnight facilities provided by the State. <br />The reasoning is that day-use facilities cost less per unit than <br /> <br />overnight facilities, attract visitors from nearby, and create <br /> <br />fewer problems, therefore, they should be undertaken by the local <br /> <br />entity. <br /> <br />In one case a water development agency has requested a <br /> <br />letter of intent from a rural county in which its proposed reser- <br /> <br />voir is to be located. The county involved has determined that <br /> <br />over 50 percent of the present boaters to reservoirs in the same <br /> <br />county came from a large metropolitan county some distance away. <br /> <br />Over 85 percent of the campers also had the Same point of origin. <br /> <br />As a result, the rural county has asked the metropolitan county to <br /> <br />share with it the non-Federal portion of the recreation costs <br /> <br />under P. L. 89-72. <br />Representatives of many low-density areas have complained <br /> <br />that the area of origin of non-local visitors should be responsible <br /> <br />for a share of the costs to provide recreation and associated <br /> <br />services to these "outsidersotl <br /> <br />When the ratio of local to nonlocal visitation is <br /> <br />established then this origin factor could be used as a basis for <br /> <br />either local or nonlocal management responsibility. <br /> <br />2. Availability of Experienced Entity <br />Any agency considered should have the responsibility and <br />legal authority and be provided with the ability to plan and <br />manage recreation. <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />. " <br /> <br />