Laserfiche WebLink
<br />" <br /> <br />on the lower main stem in terms of <br />both tons per year and <br />concentration. <br />(b) Costs per ton of salt removed from <br />the discharge for each plan <br />alternative. <br />(c) Capability of minimizing salinity <br />discharge, <br />(3) with regard to both points, one and two <br />above, the compatibility of state water <br />laws with either the complete elimination <br />of a salt discharge or any plan for <br />minimizing a salt discharge, <br />(4) The no-salt discharge requirement may ,be <br />waived in those cases where the salt load <br />reaching the main stem of the Colorado <br />River is less than one ton per day or 350 <br />tons per year, whichever is less. <br />Evaluation will be made on a case-by-case <br />basis. <br />B. Existing Facilities <br />1, The permitting authority may permit the discharge of <br />salt upon a satisfactory demonstration by the permittee <br />t~at it is not practicable to prevent the discharge of <br />a~l salt from an existing facility, <br />2, The demonstration by the applicant must include <br />information, in addition to that required under Section <br />I, A, 1, b; the following f?ctors relating to the <br />potential discharge: <br />(a) Existing tonnage of salt discharged and volume of <br />effluent, <br />(b) Cost of modifying existing industrial plant to <br />provide for no salt discharge, <br />(e) Cost of salt minimization, <br /> <br />...... <br />c.:> <br />~J <br />OJ <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />.:'~ <br />, <br /> <br /> <br />...C-....:/ ":'. <br /> <br />:'". ~y;",-, <br />