My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10836
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10836
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:14:55 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:34:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8126.600
Description
Arkansas River Coordinating Committee - Reports
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
3/5/1996
Author
DNR
Title
Report to Governor Roy Romer on Activities of the ARCC
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE <br /> <br />Each of the three subcommittees provided proposed recommendations to the full committee <br />for consideration at its August 7, 1995, meeting, The ARCC discussed these subcommittee <br />proposals and eventually adopted the following recommendations by either unanimous vote <br />or a significant majority, approaching full consensus: <br /> <br />. State officials should look to existing augmentation groups, and any new entities <br />created by valley water users, to meet future well augmentation requirements that <br />address the problems of depletions to usable stateline flows and prevent injury to <br />senior Colorado surface rights. <br /> <br />. The ability to pay will be determined by the well augmentation groups and their <br />members and any further recommendation in this area is unnecessary, <br /> <br />. With respect to the purchase and change of use of existing irrigation water rights for <br />use in augmentation: <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />Do not purchase entire basin augmentation needs from a single geographic <br />region to minimize impacts on: a) revegetation of the area, b) county tax <br />base, and c) agriculturally dependent communities, <br />Whenever possible, attempt to buy an entire water right in order to avoid <br />minority shareholder problems. <br />Attempt to purchase those systems or portions of systems that operate least <br />efficiently in terms of volume of water used and agricultural productivity, <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />2, <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />. In the event Colorado must repay Kansas for obligations incurred prior to the <br />decision of the Supremc Court of the United States rendered May 15, 1995, and <br />repayment is required in water, the State of Colorado should purchase rights to a <br />permanent, renewable supply of water. After the debt is repaid, such water should <br />be available for lease or purchase in the following order of preference: 1) by well <br />owners within the Arkansas River basin for augmentation purposes, and 2) for other <br />beneficial purposes, In order to manage any such rights in accordance with the <br />aforestated principles and to manage any such other water supplies and related <br />facilities that it may acquire for the benefit of the citizens of the Arkansas River <br />basin, the General Assembly should consider action to create a regional entity <br />consisting of members representing both surface and groundwater interests in <br />proportion to their use of water within the Arkansas River basin of Colorado to act <br />in trust on behalfofthe people of Colorado, Furthermore, the state should not lease <br />water which may become available on the spot market for the purpose of the <br />repayment of prior obligations which would place it in competition with efforts of <br />well owners to replace their subsequent depletions, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.