My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10509
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10509
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:13:20 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:21:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8460.400
Description
Platte River Basin-Platte River Basin Endangered Species Issues-Platte River Management Joint Study
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
10/1/1991
Title
Management Alternative Work Group Status Report for Fiscal Year 1991-Draft 3
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />OOU8~6 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />definitions, concerns, and listed possible examples. The eight <br /> <br />water management methods defined are: <br /> <br />1) Re-regulation of existing storage <br />2) Construct Additional storage in Existing Facilities <br /> <br />3) Construct New storage Facilities <br /> <br />4) Water Conservation <br /> <br />5) Change Water Use <br /> <br />6) Conjunctive Uses <br /> <br />7) Change Water Sources <br /> <br />8) Regulatory Programs <br /> <br />Task 6 - Develop Alternatives <br /> <br />Development of management alternatives is scheduled to begin in <br /> <br />FY 1992. This task will include combinations of water and land <br /> <br />management methods to produce a potential habitat management plan <br /> <br />to provide for species habitat recovery. <br /> <br />Task 7 - Compare Alternatives <br /> <br />To evaluate management alternatives, the Work Group recognized a <br /> <br />need for a systematic approach to compare alternatives. During <br /> <br />FY 1991, the Work Group outlined 10 criteria for comparing the <br />measurement of effects associated with the alternatives. The 10 <br /> <br />criteria were ultimately regrouped into four main criteria. The <br /> <br />four criteria identified for comparing alternatives are: 1) <br /> <br />direct costs, 2) water utilization analysis, 3) environmental <br /> <br />effects and 4) opportunity costs. Since the actual benefit and <br /> <br />effects of the alternatives are not known, estimates of potential <br /> <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.