My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10149
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10149
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:57:30 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:09:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8143.600.30A
Description
John Martin Reservoir - Other Studies
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
3/1/1946
Title
Discussion of Kansas --Caddoa Reservoir Studies-- by Arkansas River Commission of Colorado
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />r <br />,.- <br /> <br />c. <br /> <br />-.--- <br /> <br />"--- <br /> <br />C) <br /> <br />-3- <br /> <br />~ <br />~- ----- <br />'---J- ' - ---- __n ,--,-- - -- ----,-- , <br />N used by Kansas, were taken f'roI:l tabul~_tions appearing in a Colorado repor-!; <br />knO\'<Il as the "Patterson Plen," for operating the irrigation pool in Caddoa <br />Reservoir, and administering rights in the Arkansas River af'f'ected by such_ <br />reservoir operations. in accordance with the Opinion of the United States <br />Supreme Court entered December 6, 1943 in the case of Colorado and Kansas. <br />~ which Opinion. - all pending interstate litigation ha~ng been termi- <br />nated, - this COlIlllli6sion came into being. <br /> <br />6. Since the plan of reservoir operation aSS1:ned in' -the' Kansas-"Caddoa <br />Reservoir Studies" dif'fers f'rom operation plan6 heretof'ore prepared by Colo- <br />rado. and sinoe the terms used and results calculated and reported by Kansas <br />are also dif'f'erent, it may f'acilitate this discussion to pucmarize certain <br />streamflow and diversion reoords, f'or the study period 1908-1938 used by Kan- <br />sas. Some of' the basic data appearing in the f'ollowing tabulation appear to <br />have been used by Kansas. All the reference data are available f'ro:n the same <br />general sources of' information outlined in the preceding paragraph, - parti- <br />cularly Colorado Exhibits 004-222, ~.;... ~ W. -tt.... ~ >U.Q.U.- <br />L' " ' , \ <br />~~. <br /> <br />STREAl.!FID'ilS <br /> <br />REFEREllCE DATA <br /> <br />(Averages 1908-1938: Acre Feet) <br /> <br />Alrni.:'ll. Smil!ER WIllTIR <br /> <br />.ARKANSAS P.IVER AT CANON CITY <br />.ARKANSAS RIVER AT PUEBLO <br />.ARKANSAS RIVER AT LA JUIlTA <br />ARKANSAS RIVER AT CADDOA <br />ARKA..l>/SAS RIVER AT LAMAR <br />.ARKANSAS RIVER AT STATELINE <br />ARKANSAS RIVER AT GARDE!! CITY <br /> <br />519.800 <br />502,700 <br />189.200 <br />295.700 <br />193.600 <br />260.700 <br />171,000 <br /> <br />128.600 <br />118.700 <br />36.800 <br />, 62.600 <br />40.200 <br />80.300 <br />54.100 <br /> <br />391.200 <br />384.000 <br />152.400 <br />233.100 <br />153.400 <br />180,400 <br />116.900 <br /> <br />DIVERSIONS <br /> <br />COLORADO (W.D. 14. 17. 67) <br />.ABOVE CADDOA (VI.D. 14. 17) <br />BELOW CADIXlA (W.D. 67) <br />CADDOA TO WlAR <br />Wl6,R TO STATELlNE <br /> <br />895.700 6Cf7.000 252,700 <br />700.800 489.200 211,600 <br />158,900 117,800 41,100 <br />132,400 97.200 35.2!J0 <br />as. 500 2!J.600 5.900 <br />84.900 57 .100 27.800 <br />10.600 7.500 3,100 <br />74.300 J..e.600 24.700 <br /> <br />KANSAS (TOTAL-ALL DITCHEE) <br />SYRACUSE GROUP <br />GA.1l.DEN CITY GROUP <br /> <br />7. At the outset of' this discussion. attention is directed to the <br />quantities termed "water available for storage," calculated by Kansas at <br />190,000 acre f'eet annually. Per f'octnote definition, the water available for <br />stcrage was "taken to be the Stateline f'low less net accretions Lamar to State- <br />line. n As here used by Kansas. "net accretions" are the gains or increases in <br />, _stree.mi'low volumes 'between Lamar _and, the Statelina. With the few exceptions -- - - <br />noted below. net aocretions were calculated as the differences between river <br />f'lo," volumes recorded at the two gaging stations. Thus the Kanse.s f'ormulal <br />A. . SL - (SL - L), indic?_tes that A ("available for store.ge") equals L (Lamar <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.