|
<br />n
<br />
<br />,. _0)
<br />
<br />r ....
<br />f., ,.::..
<br />'- ----J ---
<br />""'"
<br />
<br />-2-
<br />
<br />Study 1
<br />
<br />"Water Avail~ble for Storage"
<br />'"Demand on Reservoir" (a)
<br />Percents of Colo. Diversions
<br />"Net Evaporation Losses"
<br />Conservation Pool
<br />Flood Pool
<br />"Flood Pool Spills
<br />"Amounts of Usable Water" (b)
<br />Annually
<br />
<br />Summer Seasons
<br />Winter Seasons
<br />
<br />190,000
<br />
<br />2170
<br />
<br />17,000
<br />3,000
<br />49,000
<br />
<br />121,000
<br />121.000
<br />o
<br />
<br />- --- - - --- ------------
<br />Study 2 Study 3 Study 4
<br />190,000 190.000 190,000
<br />15% 20% 30%
<br />17.000 12,000 6,000
<br />3.000 -.-2,000 2,000
<br />49,000 39,000 29,000
<br />121,000 137,000 153,000
<br />86,000 98.000 107.000
<br />35.000 39,000 46,000
<br />
<br />Notes: (a) So-called "demand on reservoir", or the assumed releases
<br />f'rom storage, are the percents sho= of the combined di-
<br />versions from Arkansas River (exclusive of imported wa-
<br />ters) of all irrigation ditches in Colorado Water Dis-
<br />tricts 14 and 17, above Caddoa, and Water District 67,
<br />below Caddoa, - said assumed percents being applicable
<br />in sUllllllflr months only in Study 1. and year-round in
<br />Studies 2, 3 and 4.
<br />
<br />r"
<br />~.
<br />
<br />(b) So-called "amounts of usable water" were calculated by
<br />subtracting evaporation losses and flood pool spills from,
<br />so-called "water available for storage."
<br />
<br />4. While the Kansas calculation procedure nay I ~M ,111 _ be followed. the
<br />results are uncertain. and the document is difficult to discuss. for the rea-
<br />sons, acong others, that words and t~r~ are not defined, basic records and
<br />other data used in the calculations are not included in the "document, nor are
<br />the sources of information disclosed. The t abulc.t ions were submitted without
<br />explanation as to the methods assumed for segregating streamflaws as between
<br />those previously appropriated, diverted and used, and those heretofore unused
<br />and wasted, or as to the plans assumed for river and reservoir operation to
<br />govern the storage and release of water in and from the reservoir and its di-
<br />version and use from the river.
<br />c...lo.....do m;1ht4/l'" ....J,
<br />,. With respect to sources of informationAit 9FpW9PS, from the proced-
<br />ure follo~[ed, MIa the 1 ~.JUlte 1'8);'01 L~d, tha~~r;yr and basic data. used by
<br />Ke.nsas~~previously be&= compiled by Colorado; that streamflow records used
<br />had been prepared by Colorado and introduced as exhibits in the case of Colo-
<br />rado v. Kansas.. ~QR^<:ll"'~';1'"\g tr~ Arl:e.1UQE RiV"&-r-eDd. tbe r91ntiv9 right&' Q~ the
<br />to'" <:t."--s in en<l to thll use ef i'tR v's.ter." that the rates of evaporation and
<br />siltation at Caddoa Reservoir used by Kar~es were based on estimAtes ~de by
<br />Colorlldo in connection with its so-cc.lled "Operations Plan F," which plan of
<br />reservoir and river operc.tion %~S ~sed on the provisions of th~t agree~~nt ______
<br />entered in 19" between the officiil.ls and at'torneys of the two States, con-
<br />cemin; the conotruction and operation or the Caddoa project, known as the
<br />"Stipulation of 1933;" and that diversion records of ditches in Colorado.
<br />
<br />/-.~-
<br />
<br />'-
<br />
|