My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10149
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10149
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:57:30 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:09:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8143.600.30A
Description
John Martin Reservoir - Other Studies
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
3/1/1946
Title
Discussion of Kansas --Caddoa Reservoir Studies-- by Arkansas River Commission of Colorado
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />a <br /> <br />-4- <br /> <br />r <br />'. ~ - - - ---- - ----------- ----- <br /> <br />""-1 flow). Sinc~ tJ:e total Stateline flow avers_ged 260,700 acr-e f'eet annually, <br />~and since Kansas olassifies 190,000 aore feet thereof as coming from Caddoa, <br />the remaining 70,700 acre feet was assumed to have originated below ~addoa. <br />Expressed another way, the Kansas procedure indioates that the 190,000 acre <br />feet of Stateline flow, oalculated to have :;assed leJ:1ar, was e.ssUllled to have <br />passed Caddoa, and to have been "available for storage" in ~addoa reservoir. <br /> <br />r <br />,-e <br /> <br />'e <br /> <br />--- <br /> <br />, -, <br /> <br />8. The few exceptions to the general rule above mentioned appear to <br />have resulted from substitutions by Kansas of aSBUII1ed ge.inB~'between lamar <br />and Stateline, in several ~onths of the study period (usually at times of ma- <br />jor floods) When the records themselves disolose losses. The effect of such <br />adjustments, amounting to ,changes in official records may be illustrated by <br />comparing the 190,000 acre feet calculated by Kansas. with the 193.600 acre <br />feet annually recorded at Lamar. Such a difference. amounting to 3.600 acre <br />feet, or less than 2 percent, is relatively small, and at this time _y be <br />ignored. <br /> <br /> <br />9. While the terms "available for store.ge" and "amourJ; s of usable water". <br />are not denned in the document under discussi on, it is apparent from an an"ly- <br />sis of the calculation procedure followed by K",sas, as herein later more fully <br />discussed, that the 190.000 acre feet of Caddo a flow considered "aVlli lable for' <br />store,ge" is excl',lsive of quantities hBrein termed "Caddoa flows heretofore <br />U3 ed in Color"do " but inoludes streamflows in some months in excess of avail- <br />able and effective storage capaoity in the assumed completed irrigation pool. <br />and includes the calculated "amounts of usable water," - oaloulated by de- <br />duoting evaporation losses and flood pool spills from the 190.000 aore feet <br />considered "available for storage;" and that the calculated "lU:lounts of.usable' <br />_tel'," in turn. include quantities herein 1c:;rmeqc"Caddoa, f~.ows~her!":tot:or\l ._~ <br />used in Kansas," as well as "new water," - ~e-f.if.1':t~!!~ ~-W- attri- <br />butable to operations of Caddoa reservoir. whioh segregations of the calou- <br />lated "amounts of usable water" 'MIre not IIlll.de in the document under discussion. <br />but are necessary to an understanding of the quanti ties of water therein re- <br />ported. <br /> <br />10. The plan of reservoir operation assumed by Kansas. while unexplained. <br />appears to consider "Caddoa f'lCl'l's her!3'tofore used in Colorado" as unavailable <br />for storage, whereas "Caddoa flows heretofore used in- Kansas" are treated as <br />"available for storage," - which raises a question as to how the irrigation <br />pool in Caddo a reservoir shall be operated, and what are its purposes as au- <br />thorized by Congress? Exolusive of the primary purpose of flood oontrol, aO- <br />complished by storage of water in the flood pool, at times of major floods and <br />abnormal streamflows.the irrigation pool was autr~rized for "streamflow regula- <br />tion e-Ild water oonservation" for the benent of irrigation interests in Colo- <br />rado and Kansas. Both .....streamfloVl regulat10op' and water conservation....... require, <br />and may be aocomplished only by the storage of water in the irrigation pool. - <br />_tel' oonservation by the storage of streamf'lovrs heretofore unused and wasted. <br />to make them water supplies available for additional diversion and increased <br />use in the two States; and streamf'low regulation by the storage of 6"treamflows <br />heretofore appropriated, diverted and used, to make them available when and as <br />needed by lands and crops. rather than_when they occurred ~nder pre~Caddoa__~___ <br />conditions. - - - <br /> <br />......., <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.